Fattahi Hamid Reza, Pakshir Hamid Reza, Hedayati Zohreh
Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Eur J Orthod. 2006 Oct;28(5):491-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl012. Epub 2006 Jun 8.
This retrospective investigation was designed to compare tooth size discrepancies among subjects with different skeletal malocclusions in an orthodontic population. The study employed the pre-treatment models of 200 patients (100 males, 100 females, aged from 14 to 20 years) selected from the records of the Orthodontic Department, Shiraz Dental School. The subjects were from four malocclusion groups, Class I, Class II division 1, Class II division 2, and Class III, with the corresponding skeletal characteristics. Each group comprised 50 healthy individuals (25 males, 25 females). The mesio-distal dimensions of teeth were measured using digital electronic callipers (accurate to 0.01 mm) and the Bolton indices were determined. The data were statistically analysed using analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test, with the level of significance set at P < 0.05. The results revealed that the mean anterior ratio (79.01) for the whole sample was statistically significantly different from Bolton's (77.2) but no significant difference was found for the overall ratio. The posterior and overall ratios of the Class III malocclusion group were statistically greater than the other malocclusion groups (P < 0.05). The mean anterior ratio of the Class III group was greater than that of the Class II group. However, there was no difference when compared with the Class I malocclusion group. For the two types of Class II malocclusion, no significant ratio differences were observed.
本回顾性研究旨在比较正畸人群中不同骨骼错牙合畸形患者的牙大小差异。该研究采用了从设拉子牙科学院正畸科记录中选取的200例患者(100名男性,100名女性,年龄14至20岁)的治疗前模型。受试者来自四个错牙合畸形组,即安氏I类、安氏II类1分类、安氏II类2分类和安氏III类,具有相应的骨骼特征。每组包括50名健康个体(25名男性,25名女性)。使用数字电子卡尺(精确到0.01毫米)测量牙齿的近远中尺寸,并确定博尔顿指数。数据采用方差分析和邓肯多重极差检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平设定为P < 0.05。结果显示,整个样本的平均前牙比(79.01)与博尔顿标准值(77.2)在统计学上有显著差异,但总比无显著差异。安氏III类错牙合畸形组的后牙比和总比在统计学上大于其他错牙合畸形组(P < 0.05)。安氏III类组的平均前牙比大于安氏II类组。然而,与安氏I类错牙合畸形组相比无差异。对于两种类型的安氏II类错牙合畸形,未观察到显著的比值差异。