Desbrow Ben, Bauer Judith, Blum Claudia, Kandasamy Amutha, McDonald Alison, Montgomery Kate
Heart Foundation Research Centre, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
J Ren Nutr. 2005 Apr;15(2):211-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2004.10.005.
To evaluate the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in hemodialysis patients.
A cross-sectional observational study assessing the nutritional status of hemodialysis patients.
Private tertiary Australian hospital.
Sixty patients, ages 63.9 +/- 16.2 years.
Scored PG-SGA questionnaire, comparison of PG-SGA score > or =9 with subjective global assessment (SGA), albumin, corrected arm muscle area, and triceps skinfold.
According to SGA, 80% of patients were well nourished and 20% of patients were malnourished. Patients classified as well nourished (SGA-A) attained a significantly lower median PG-SGA score compared with those rated as moderately malnourished or at risk of malnutrition (SGA-B). A PG-SGA score > or =9 had a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 92% at predicting SGA classification. There were significant correlations between the PG-SGA score and serum albumin, PG-SGA score, and percentage weight loss over the past 6 months. There was no association between PG-SGA score and body mass index or anthropometric measurements.
The scored PG-SGA is an easy-to-use nutrition assessment tool that allows quick identification of malnutrition in hemodialysis patients.
评估计分的患者主观全面评定法(PG-SGA)作为血液透析患者营养评估工具的效果。
一项评估血液透析患者营养状况的横断面观察性研究。
澳大利亚一家私立三级医院。
60名患者,年龄63.9±16.2岁。
采用计分的PG-SGA问卷,比较PG-SGA评分≥9分与主观全面评定法(SGA)、白蛋白、校正手臂肌肉面积及三头肌皮褶厚度的情况。
根据SGA评估,80%的患者营养良好,20%的患者营养不良。与评定为中度营养不良或有营养不良风险(SGA-B)的患者相比,被归类为营养良好(SGA-A)的患者PG-SGA中位数得分显著更低。PG-SGA评分≥9分在预测SGA分类时的敏感度为83%,特异度为92%。PG-SGA评分与血清白蛋白、PG-SGA评分以及过去6个月的体重减轻百分比之间存在显著相关性。PG-SGA评分与体重指数或人体测量指标之间无关联。
计分的PG-SGA是一种易于使用的营养评估工具,可快速识别血液透析患者的营养不良情况。