• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量患者对植入式心脏设备治疗的接受度:佛罗里达患者接受度调查的初步心理测量学研究

Measuring patient acceptance of implantable cardiac device therapy: initial psychometric investigation of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey.

作者信息

Burns Jason L, Serber Eva R, Keim Stephen, Sears Samuel F

机构信息

Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Apr;16(4):384-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2005.40134.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1540-8167.2005.40134.x
PMID:15828880
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient acceptance of implantable device therapy has been established as an important outcome but the operationalization and validation of a measure of patient acceptance of implantable device therapy has not been fully completed. This study sought to validate a new measure of patient acceptance of cardiac implantable devices called the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS).

METHODS

The sample consisted of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD; n = 58), and implantable atrioverter defibrillator (ICD-AT; n = 96), and pacemaker (PM, n = 84) patients. Mean age of all participants was 69 years; they were mostly male (62%) and married (75%). The final FPAS comprised 15 items with four consistent factors: Return to Function, Device-Related Distress, Positive Appraisal, and Body Image Concerns.

RESULTS

The total FPAS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83), and internal consistency for each of the subscales ranged from 0.74 to 0.89. The FPAS demonstrated convergent, divergent, and discriminant validity when compared to other self-report measures of QOL, atrial symptoms, depression, and anxiety. A total FPAS score can be formed and between group comparisons with this sample indicated that ICD patients report a high level of acceptance (mean = 76), ICD-AT patients report a significantly higher level of acceptance (mean = 81.1), and PM patients reported the highest level of patient acceptance (mean = 85.4) of these implantable device groups.

CONCLUSION

This initial psychometric investigation of the FPAS suggests that the FPAS may be useful in both clinical and research settings to assess patient acceptance of implantable cardiac devices.

摘要

引言

患者对植入式设备治疗的接受程度已被确立为一项重要结果,但用于衡量患者对植入式设备治疗接受程度的方法的实施和验证尚未完全完成。本研究旨在验证一种名为佛罗里达患者接受度调查(FPAS)的衡量患者对心脏植入式设备接受程度的新方法。

方法

样本包括植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD;n = 58)、植入式心房转复除颤器(ICD - AT;n = 96)和起搏器(PM,n = 84)患者。所有参与者的平均年龄为69岁;他们大多为男性(62%)且已婚(75%)。最终的FPAS包含15个项目,有四个一致的因素:功能恢复、与设备相关的困扰、积极评价和身体形象担忧。

结果

FPAS总分显示出良好的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.83),各子量表的内部一致性范围为0.74至0.89。与其他生活质量、心房症状、抑郁和焦虑的自我报告测量方法相比,FPAS显示出收敛效度、区分效度和判别效度。可以形成一个总的FPAS分数,与该样本的组间比较表明,ICD患者报告的接受程度较高(平均 = 76),ICD - AT患者报告的接受程度显著更高(平均 = 81.1),而在这些植入式设备组中,PM患者报告的患者接受程度最高(平均 = 85.4)。

结论

对FPAS的这一初步心理测量学调查表明,FPAS在临床和研究环境中可能有助于评估患者对植入式心脏设备的接受程度。

相似文献

1
Measuring patient acceptance of implantable cardiac device therapy: initial psychometric investigation of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey.测量患者对植入式心脏设备治疗的接受度:佛罗里达患者接受度调查的初步心理测量学研究
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Apr;16(4):384-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2005.40134.x.
2
Correlates of patient acceptance of the cardioverter defibrillator: cross-validation of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey in Danish patients.心脏复律除颤器患者接受度的相关因素:丹麦患者中佛罗里达患者接受度调查的交叉验证
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Sep;31(9):1168-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01158.x.
3
Disease-specific quality of life-patient acceptance: racial and gender differences in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.疾病特异性生活质量-患者接受度:植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的种族和性别差异。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):285-93. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e31824e072e.
4
Monitoring device acceptance in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients using the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey.使用佛罗里达患者接受度调查问卷监测植入式心脏复律除颤器患者对监测设备的接受情况。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Mar;35(3):283-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03299.x. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
5
Do patients accept implantable atrial defibrillation therapy? Results from the Patient Atrial Shock Survey of Acceptance and Tolerance (PASSAT) Study.患者是否接受植入式心房除颤治疗?来自患者心房电击接受与耐受性调查(PASSAT)研究的结果。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004 Mar;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2004.03406.x.
6
No long-term psychological morbidity living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator under advisory: the Medtronic Marquis experience.在咨询指导下使用植入式心脏复律除颤器生活不存在长期心理疾病:美敦力玛奎斯的经验。
Europace. 2009 Jan;11(1):26-30. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun317. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
7
Gender differences in anxiety and concerns about the cardioverter defibrillator.焦虑及对心脏复律除颤器担忧方面的性别差异。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 May;32(5):614-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02334.x.
8
Health-related quality of life of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators compared with that of pacemaker recipients.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者与起搏器接受者的健康相关生活质量比较。
Europace. 2006 Mar;8(3):168-74. doi: 10.1093/europace/euj052. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
9
Clustering of poor device acceptance and Type D personality is associated with increased distress in Danish cardioverter-defibrillator patients.丹麦心脏复律除颤器患者中,设备接受度差与D型人格的聚集与痛苦增加有关。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Jan;32(1):29-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02173.x.
10
The impact of technology dependency on device acceptance and quality of life in persons with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.技术依赖对植入式心脏除颤器患者的设备接受度和生活质量的影响。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(6):E65-73. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e31827b9789.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological Interventions for Reducing Distress in Patients with Cardiac Arrhythmias.用于减轻心律失常患者痛苦的心理干预措施。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jun 25;27(1):102. doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02253-4.
2
Psychometric Performance of Florida Patient Acceptance Survey in Danish Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients.佛罗里达患者接受度调查在丹麦植入式心脏复律除颤器患者中的心理测量学表现。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Jul;48(7):790-798. doi: 10.1111/pace.15224. Epub 2025 Jun 15.
3
Leadless Pacemakers: The "Leading Edge" of Quality of Life in Cardic Electrophysiology.
无导线起搏器:心脏电生理学中生活质量的“前沿”。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Mar 31;27(1):77. doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02228-5.
4
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey.《佛罗里达患者接受度调查问卷》韩文版的效度与信度
Nurs Open. 2025 Mar;12(3):e70177. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70177.
5
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire for use in Brazil.《远程医疗满意度调查问卷》在巴西使用的翻译及跨文化调适
J Bras Pneumol. 2024 Sep 27;50(4):e20240030. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20240030. eCollection 2024.
6
Short- and long-term patient-reported outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: Results from the RHYTHM DETECT Registry.皮下植入式心律转复除颤器治疗的短期和长期患者报告结局:RHYTHM DETECT注册研究结果
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jun 6;5(7):474-478. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.05.009. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Patient Information Needs and Decision-Making Before a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device: A Qualitative Study Utilizing Social Media Data.心脏植入式电子设备植入前患者的信息需求与决策制定:一项利用社交媒体数据的定性研究
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2025 Mar;32(1):121-130. doi: 10.1007/s10880-024-10024-6. Epub 2024 May 21.
8
Predictors of Quality of Life, Anxiety and Acceptance in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者生活质量、焦虑和接受度的预测因素。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Apr;121(4):e20230590. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230590.
9
Selection of social comparison standards in cardiac patients with and without experienced defibrillator shock.有和无经历过除颤器电击的心脏病患者中社会比较标准的选择。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 6;14(1):5551. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51366-3.
10
The effect of virtual interactive nurse-led support group intervention on fatigue, shock anxiety, and acceptance of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a randomized trial.虚拟互动护士主导的支持小组干预对植入式心脏复律除颤器患者疲劳、休克焦虑和接受程度的影响:一项随机试验。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jan 11;24(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03713-5.