• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旧日时光?

Good old days?

作者信息

Greenberg Charles J

机构信息

Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208014, New Haven, CT, 06850-8014, USA.

出版信息

Biomed Digit Libr. 2005 Apr 13;2(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1742-5581-2-3.

DOI:10.1186/1742-5581-2-3
PMID:15829010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1097712/
Abstract

Alternative models of subsidizing scholarly publishing and dissemination have germinated and gathered momentum in the fertile soil of dissatisfaction. Like the stubborn spring dandelion that needs but a small crack in the sidewalk to flower boldly, the first flowers of Open Access in library literature, including Biomedical Digital Libraries, have sensed their opportunity to change the existing paradigm of giving away our scholarship and intellectual property, only to buy it back for the privilege of knowing it can be read. Will biomedical digital library and informatics researchers understand their role in a new era of Open Access simply by desiring an immediate uninhibited global audience and recognizing the necessity of open access peer-reviewed literature to become self-sufficient?

摘要

在不满的沃土中,资助学术出版和传播的替代模式已经萌芽并蓬勃发展。就像顽强的春日蒲公英,只需人行道上一条小裂缝就能大胆绽放一样,图书馆文献(包括生物医学数字图书馆)中的开放获取的首批成果,已经察觉到改变现有学术成果和知识产权赠送模式的机会,即先赠送,之后又为了能阅读而买回。生物医学数字图书馆和信息学研究人员是否仅通过渴望立即拥有不受限制的全球读者群体,并认识到开放获取的同行评审文献实现自给自足的必要性,就能理解他们在开放获取新时代中的角色呢?

相似文献

1
Good old days?旧日时光?
Biomed Digit Libr. 2005 Apr 13;2(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1742-5581-2-3.
2
Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.开放获取授权威胁科学信息的传播。
J Neuroophthalmol. 2008 Mar;28(1):72-4. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e318167cf39.
3
Scientific Authors in a Changing World of Scholarly Communication: What Does the Future Hold?科学作者在不断变化的学术交流世界中:未来会怎样?
Am J Med. 2020 Jan;133(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
4
Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries.开放获取:对学术出版和医学图书馆的影响
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jul;94(3):253-62.
5
Open access in the biomedical field: a unique opportunity for researchers (and research itself).生物医学领域的开放获取:研究人员(以及研究本身)的独特机遇。
Eura Medicophys. 2007 Jun;43(2):203-13.
6
The changing landscape of scholarly publishing: will radiation research survive?学术出版格局的变化:放射研究能否存续?
Radiat Res. 2013 Oct;180(4):335-9. doi: 10.1667/RR3528.2. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
7
The end of print: digitization and its consequence--revolutionary changes in scholarly and social communication and in scientific research.印刷时代的终结:数字化及其影响——学术与社会交流以及科学研究领域的革命性变革。
Int J Toxicol. 2005 Jan-Feb;24(1):25-34. doi: 10.1080/10915810590921351.
8
The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review.开放获取的学术、经济和社会影响:基于证据的综述。
F1000Res. 2016 Apr 11;5:632. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8460.3. eCollection 2016.
9
Open access part II: the structure, resources, and implications for nurses.
Online J Issues Nurs. 2011 Nov 23;17(1):7.
10
Questioning the efficacy of 'gold' open access to published articles.质疑已发表文章“黄金”开放获取的有效性。
Nurse Res. 2015 Jul;22(6):8-10. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.6.8.e1370.

本文引用的文献

1
Journal pricing issues: an economic perspective.期刊定价问题:经济学视角
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990 Jul;78(3):217-23.