• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术出版格局的变化:放射研究能否存续?

The changing landscape of scholarly publishing: will radiation research survive?

机构信息

a University Library, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

Radiat Res. 2013 Oct;180(4):335-9. doi: 10.1667/RR3528.2. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1667/RR3528.2
PMID:24044487
Abstract

As a society published journal, Radiation Research has been a successful and enduring project of the Radiation Research Society (RRS). In 59 years of publication, the journal has produced 732 issues and 10,712 articles. As a nonprofit organization, RRS, like most societies, has used revenues from subscriptions to support, in part, the life of the organization (meetings, conferences and grants to new scholars). The model for scientific publishing, however, continues to evolve. Radiation Research has weathered the rise of electronic publishing, consolidation in the commercial publishing industry, the aggregation of library subscriptions and library subscription cuts. Recent years have seen dramatic changes in how scholarly publishing is financed and new funder and institution policies will accelerate these changes. The growth of open access to journal articles reflects the information habits of readers and facilitates the dissemination of new knowledge. The Radiation Research Society, however, will need to account for and adapt to changes in the publishing market if it intends to support the communication of peer reviewed scholarship in the future.

摘要

作为一个由学会主办的期刊,《辐射研究》(Radiation Research)是辐射研究学会(Radiation Research Society,RRS)的一个成功且持久的项目。在 59 年的出版历程中,该期刊共出版了 732 期,收录了 10712 篇文章。作为一个非营利组织,RRS 与大多数学会一样,利用订阅收入来部分支持组织的运作(会议、会议和对新学者的资助)。然而,科学出版模式仍在不断发展。《辐射研究》经受住了电子出版的兴起、商业出版业的整合、图书馆订阅的集中以及图书馆订阅的削减的考验。近年来,学术出版的融资方式发生了巨大变化,新的资助者和机构政策将加速这些变化。期刊文章的开放获取的增长反映了读者的信息习惯,并促进了新知识的传播。然而,如果辐射研究学会希望在未来支持同行评审奖学金的交流,就需要考虑并适应出版市场的变化。

相似文献

1
The changing landscape of scholarly publishing: will radiation research survive?学术出版格局的变化:放射研究能否存续?
Radiat Res. 2013 Oct;180(4):335-9. doi: 10.1667/RR3528.2. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
2
A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.一个学术团体对出版的看法。
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
3
Electronic publishing in radiology: economics and the future.放射学中的电子出版:经济学与未来。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Nov;1(11):815-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.05.014.
4
Exploring new frontiers of electronic publishing in biomedical science.探索生物医学科学中电子出版的新领域。
Singapore Med J. 2009 Mar;50(3):230-4.
5
Open Access, the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, and the Nutrition Society journals.开放获取、知识共享署名许可协议与营养学会期刊
Br J Nutr. 2012 Dec 14;108(11):1913-4. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512004928. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
6
Do financial factors such as author page charges and industry funding impact on the nature of published research in infectious diseases?诸如作者版面费和行业资助等财务因素是否会影响传染病领域已发表研究的性质?
Health Info Libr J. 2006 Sep;23(3):214-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2006.00665.x.
7
The Open Access initiative in scientific and biomedical publishing: fourth in the series on editorship.科学与生物医学出版中的开放获取倡议:编辑系列文章之四
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;139(1):156-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.10.010.
8
Scholarly publishing. Particle physicists want to expand open access.学术出版。粒子物理学家希望扩大开放获取。
Science. 2006 Sep 1;313(5791):1215. doi: 10.1126/science.313.5791.1215.
9
Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving.扩大对已发表研究的获取:开放获取与自我存档。
J Neuroophthalmol. 2008 Mar;28(1):69-71. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e318167730b.
10
Scholarly publishing. Bill would require free public access to research papers.学术出版。法案将要求研究论文免费向公众开放获取。
Science. 2006 May 12;312(5775):828. doi: 10.1126/science.312.5775.828a.

引用本文的文献

1
Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences.掠夺性出版、有问题的同行评审和欺诈性会议。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Dec 15;78(10):176. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7810176.