• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

角膜专科住院医生与经验丰富的外科 staff 医生进行穿透性角膜移植术的结果比较。 (注:这里“staff surgeon”不太明确准确中文表述,可根据实际情况调整,比如“主治医生”等 )

Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty performed by cornea fellows compared with that of an experienced staff surgeon.

作者信息

Hammoudi Dena S, Segev Fani, Abdolell Mohamed, Rootman David S

机构信息

University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Cornea. 2005 May;24(4):410-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000151549.15528.07.

DOI:10.1097/01.ico.0000151549.15528.07
PMID:15829796
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome of penetrating keratoplasty performed by supervised cornea fellows and an experienced staff surgeon.

METHODS

Retrospective review of cases of penetrating keratoplasty performed over a 4-year period with corneal topography performed on a clear graft. Overall, 202 cases from 184 patients were included: 108 performed by an experienced staff surgeon and 94 cases by 9 cornea fellows. Charts were reviewed for topographic astigmatism, other topographic indices, refractive astigmatism and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), all recorded after removal of the 10-0 sutures while the 11-0 suture remained in place. Graft clarity was assessed at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean postoperative topographic astigmatism was 4.60 +/- 2.7 diopters in the fellow group and 4.08 +/- 2.41 diopters in the staff group. The mean postoperative time at which corneal topography was obtained was 9.53 +/- 4.4 months in the fellow group and 9.22 +/- 4.6 months in the staff group. Mean refractive astigmatism was 3.77 +/- 1.97 diopters (fellows) and 3.49 +/- 1.93 diopters (staff). Mean surface asymmetry index (SAI) was 1.89 +/- 1.42 (fellows) and 1.61 +/- 1.08 (staff). Mean surface regularity index (SRI) was 1.43 +/- 0.72 (fellows) and 1.45 +/- 0.61 (staff). Mean BCVA was 0.49 logMAR (20/61) +/- 4.3 lines (fellows) and 0.47 logMAR (20/59) +/- 3.9 lines (staff). In the fellow group, 85 (90%) cases remained clear over a mean follow-up of 32 months and in the staff group 100 (93%) grafts remained clear over a mean follow-up of 38 months. Simple and multiple regression analyses indicated no difference between the 2 groups in all outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Properly supervised cornea fellows in training achieved favorable penetrating keratoplasty results that were comparable to those of an experienced staff surgeon.

摘要

目的

比较在监督下由角膜专科住院医师和经验丰富的 staff 外科医生进行穿透性角膜移植术的结果。

方法

回顾性分析4年间进行穿透性角膜移植术的病例,并对透明植片进行角膜地形图检查。总共纳入了184例患者的202例病例:108例由经验丰富的 staff 外科医生进行,94例由9名角膜专科住院医师进行。查阅病历以获取地形图散光、其他地形图指数、屈光性散光和最佳矫正视力(BCVA),所有数据均在拆除10-0缝线而11-0缝线仍在位时记录。在最终随访时评估植片清晰度。

结果

专科住院医师组术后平均地形图散光为4.60±2.7屈光度,staff 外科医生组为4.08±2.41屈光度。专科住院医师组获取角膜地形图的术后平均时间为9.53±4.4个月,staff 外科医生组为9.22±4.6个月。平均屈光性散光专科住院医师组为3.77±1.97屈光度,staff 外科医生组为3.49±1.93屈光度。平均表面不对称指数(SAI)专科住院医师组为1.89±1.42,staff 外科医生组为1.61±1.08。平均表面规则性指数(SRI)专科住院医师组为1.43±0.72,staff 外科医生组为1.45±0.61。平均BCVA专科住院医师组为0.49 logMAR(20/61)±4.3行,staff 外科医生组为0.47 logMAR(20/59)±3.9行。在专科住院医师组,平均随访32个月期间85例(90%)植片保持透明,在 staff 外科医生组,平均随访38个月期间100例(93%)植片保持透明。简单和多元回归分析表明两组在所有结果指标上无差异。

结论

接受适当监督培训的角膜专科住院医师取得了与经验丰富的 staff 外科医生相当的良好穿透性角膜移植术结果。

相似文献

1
Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty performed by cornea fellows compared with that of an experienced staff surgeon.角膜专科住院医生与经验丰富的外科 staff 医生进行穿透性角膜移植术的结果比较。 (注:这里“staff surgeon”不太明确准确中文表述,可根据实际情况调整,比如“主治医生”等 )
Cornea. 2005 May;24(4):410-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000151549.15528.07.
2
Comparison of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty by experienced cornea surgeons and cornea fellows.经验丰富的角膜外科医生与角膜专科住院医师行穿透性角膜移植术后散光情况的比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 May;123(5):636-43. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71076-1.
3
Intra-individual variability of penetrating keratoplasty outcome after excimer laser versus motorized corneal trephination.准分子激光与电动角膜环钻术后穿透性角膜移植术效果的个体内变异性
J Refract Surg. 2006 Oct;22(8):804-10. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20061001-11.
4
Repeat keratoplasty for correction of high or irregular postkeratoplasty astigmatism in clear corneal grafts.重复角膜移植术用于矫正透明角膜移植术后的高度或不规则散光。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 May;139(5):826-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.008.
5
Corneal interactive programmed topographic ablation customized photorefractive keratectomy for correction of postkeratoplasty astigmatism.角膜交互式程序化地形图消融定制准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗角膜移植术后散光。
Ophthalmology. 2001 Nov;108(11):2029-37. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00807-7.
6
Stepwise Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy in Treatment of Irregular Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty and Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty.逐步引导性准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗穿透性角膜移植术和深板层角膜移植术后不规则散光
Cornea. 2017 Nov;36(11):1308-1315. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001359.
7
Impact of phototherapeutic keratectomy on the outcome of subsequent penetrating keratoplasty in patients with stromal corneal dystrophies.光治疗性角膜切除术对角膜基质营养不良患者后续穿透性角膜移植术结果的影响。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb;137(2):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.08.039.
8
Long-term refractive results of elliptical excimer laser penetrating keratoplasty (EELPK).椭圆形准分子激光穿透性角膜移植术(EELPK)的长期屈光结果
Curr Eye Res. 2007 Nov;32(11):953-9. doi: 10.1080/02713680701689781.
9
Wedge resection for high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: refractive and histopathologic changes.圆锥角膜穿透性角膜移植术后高散光的楔形切除术:屈光和组织病理学变化。
Cornea. 2010 Jun;29(6):595-600. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181ba0abf.
10
[Interpretation of corneal topography after penetrating keratoplasty with wave-front parameters--comparison between non-mechanical trepanation with excimer laser and motor trepanation].穿透性角膜移植术后角膜地形图的波前参数解读——准分子激光非机械性环钻与电动环钻的比较
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1998 Jun;212(6):433-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1034927.

引用本文的文献

1
Resident Skills Assessment in Corneal Suturing: A Comprehensive Review of Currently Proposed Educational Programs and Evaluation Tools.角膜缝合术中住院医师技能评估:对当前提议的教育项目和评估工具的全面综述。
J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2021 Dec 31;13(2):e304-e310. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740065. eCollection 2021 Jul.