Kalavathy C M, Parmar Pragya, Kaliamurthy J, Philip Vinitha Rachel, Ramalingam M D K, Jesudasan C A Nelson, Thomas Philip A
Institute of Ophthalmology, Joseph Eye Hospital, Tamil Nadu, India.
Cornea. 2005 May;24(4):449-52. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000151539.92865.3e.
To compare the clinical efficacy of itraconazole 1% eyedrops with a standard therapy regimen (natamycin 5% eyedrops) for topical monotherapy of fungal keratitis.
Patients presenting with suspected uniocular microbial keratitis over a period of 12 months (January to December 2002) underwent detailed clinical examination and microbiological investigation. One hundred consecutive patients with direct smear- and/or culture-proven fungal keratitis were enrolled in the study after obtaining informed consent. The ulcers were categorized as severe or nonsevere. The first 50 consecutive patients received primary therapy with topical natamycin hourly, and the next 50 consecutive patients received topical itraconazole hourly. The primary efficacy criteria were the physician's judgment of clinical success, cure rate, and the rate of treatment failure.
The diagnosis of fungal keratitis was established by positive microscopy and culture findings in 88 patients and by positive microscopy alone in 12 patients. Species of Fusarium, Aspergillus, and Curvularia were the principal isolates. Thirty-six (72%) of 50 patients (28 of 37 with nonsevere keratitis and 8 of 13 with severe keratitis) showed a favorable response to primary natamycin therapy (mean duration, 20.5 days), while 30 (60%) of 150 patients (25 of 38 with nonsevere keratitis and 5 of 12 with severe keratitis) exhibited a favorable response to primary itraconazole therapy (mean duration, 23.1 days). In keratitis due to Fusarium spp, 19 (79%) of 24 patients showed a favorable response to natamycin, which was significantly greater than the 8 (44%) of 18 patients who showed a favorable response to itraconazole (P < 0.02). However, no such difference was evident in keratitis due to Aspergillus spp or Curvularia spp; in keratitis due to Aspergillus spp, favorable responses were noted in 6 (54.5%) of 11 patients receiving natamycin and 5 (50%) of 10 patients receiving itraconazole, while in keratitis due to Curvurlaria spp, such responses occurred in both patients receiving natamycin and in 8 (89%) of 9 patients receiving itraconazole. Both antifungal formulations were generally well tolerated with no obvious adverse effects.
Topical natamycin should continue to be considered as the treatment of choice for filamentous fungal keratitis; when natamycin is unavailable, topical itraconazole therapy could be used, particularly if the infections are due to Aspergillus or Curvularia spp.
比较1%伊曲康唑滴眼液与标准治疗方案(5%那他霉素滴眼液)局部单药治疗真菌性角膜炎的临床疗效。
在12个月(2002年1月至12月)期间出现疑似单眼微生物性角膜炎的患者接受了详细的临床检查和微生物学调查。在获得知情同意后,连续100例经直接涂片和/或培养证实为真菌性角膜炎的患者纳入研究。溃疡分为重度和非重度。前50例连续患者每小时接受一次那他霉素局部初始治疗,接下来的50例连续患者每小时接受一次伊曲康唑局部治疗。主要疗效标准为医生对临床成功、治愈率和治疗失败率的判断。
88例患者通过显微镜检查和培养结果阳性确诊为真菌性角膜炎,12例患者仅通过显微镜检查阳性确诊。镰刀菌属、曲霉菌属和弯孢霉菌属为主要分离菌株。50例患者中的36例(72%)(非重度角膜炎37例中的28例,重度角膜炎13例中的8例)对初始那他霉素治疗反应良好(平均持续时间为20.5天),而50例患者中的30例(60%)(非重度角膜炎38例中的25例,重度角膜炎12例中的5例)对初始伊曲康唑治疗反应良好(平均持续时间为23.1天)。在镰刀菌属引起的角膜炎中,24例患者中的19例(79%)对那他霉素反应良好,这显著高于18例患者中8例(44%)对伊曲康唑反应良好的比例(P<0.02)。然而,在曲霉菌属或弯孢霉菌属引起的角膜炎中没有明显差异;在曲霉菌属引起的角膜炎中,接受那他霉素治疗的11例患者中有6例(54.5%)反应良好,接受伊曲康唑治疗的10例患者中有5例(50%)反应良好,而在弯孢霉菌属引起的角膜炎中,接受那他霉素治疗的2例患者和接受伊曲康唑治疗的9例患者中的8例(89%)均反应良好。两种抗真菌制剂总体耐受性良好,无明显不良反应。
局部应用那他霉素应继续被视为丝状真菌性角膜炎的治疗选择;当无法获得那他霉素时,可使用局部伊曲康唑治疗,特别是如果感染是由曲霉菌属或弯孢霉菌属引起的。