Mitroff Stephen R, Scholl Brian J, Wynn Karen
Department of Psychology, Yale University, Box 208205, New Haven, CT 06520-8205, USA.
Cognition. 2005 May;96(1):67-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.008. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
Object files (OFs) are hypothesized mid-level representations which mediate our conscious perception of persisting objects-e.g. telling us 'which went where'. Despite the appeal of the OF framework, not previous research has directly explored whether OFs do indeed correspond to conscious percepts. Here we present at least one case wherein conscious percepts of 'which went where' in dynamic ambiguous displays diverge from the analogous correspondence computed by the OF system. Observers viewed a 'bouncing/streaming' display in which two identical objects moved such that they could have either bounced off or streamed past each other. We measured two dependent variables: (1) an explicit report of perceived bouncing or streaming; and (2) an implicit 'object-specific preview benefit' (OSPB), wherein a 'preview' of information on a specific object speeds the recognition of that information at a later point when it appears again on the same object (compared to when it reappears on a different object), beyond display-wide priming. When the displays were manipulated such that observers had a strong bias to perceive streaming (on over 95% of the trials), there was nevertheless a strong OSPB in the opposite direction-such that the object files appeared to have 'bounced' even though the percept 'streamed'. Given that OSPBs have been taken as a hallmark of the operation of object files, the five experiments reported here suggest that in at least some specialized (and perhaps ecologically invalid) cases, conscious percepts of 'which went where' in dynamic ambiguous displays can diverge from the mapping computed by the object-file system.
目标文件(OFs)被假定为中间层次的表征,它介导我们对持续存在物体的有意识感知——例如告诉我们“哪个物体去了哪里”。尽管目标文件框架很有吸引力,但之前没有研究直接探讨过目标文件是否确实与有意识的感知相对应。在这里,我们展示了至少一个案例,即在动态模糊显示中,“哪个物体去了哪里”的有意识感知与目标文件系统计算出的类似对应关系不同。观察者观看了一个“弹跳/流动”显示,其中两个相同的物体移动,使得它们要么相互反弹,要么相互流过。我们测量了两个因变量:(1)对感知到的弹跳或流动的明确报告;(2)一种隐含的“特定物体预览优势”(OSPB),即关于特定物体的信息“预览”会加快该信息在稍后再次出现在同一物体上时(与再次出现在不同物体上相比)的识别速度,超出了整个显示范围的启动效应。当对显示进行操作,使观察者有强烈的倾向感知流动(在超过95%的试验中)时,然而在相反方向上仍有强烈的OSPB——以至于目标文件似乎“反弹”了,尽管感知是“流动”的。鉴于OSPB被视为目标文件运作的一个标志,这里报告的五个实验表明,在至少一些特殊的(也许在生态上无效的)情况下,动态模糊显示中“哪个物体去了哪里”的有意识感知可能与目标文件系统计算出的映射不同。