Thuret G, Carricajo A, Vautrin A C, Raberin H, Acquart S, Garraud O, Gain P, Aubert G
Department of Ophthalmology, Bellevue Hospital, 25 Boulevard Pasteur, F 42055 Saint-Etienne Cedex 2, France.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 May;89(5):586-90. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.053439.
BACKGROUND/AIM: The consequences of fungal contamination of an organ cultured cornea, though exceptional, are often disastrous for the recipient. Consequently, eye banks often quarantine corneas for 10 days or more before passing them for grafting. This period, though detrimental to the endothelial cell density of the delivered cornea, is necessary to detect contamination using conventional microbiological methods. The authors previously validated the use of a pair of aerobic and anaerobic blood bottles for sensitive and rapid detection of bacteria. To allow a short quarantine period, it remained only to optimise detection of fungi. The authors aimed to compare sensitivity and rapidity of fungal contamination detection by three methods: blood bottles, Sabouraud, and daily visual inspection of the organ culture medium.
Four inocula (10(6), 10(4), 10(2), 10 colony forming unit (CFU) per ml) of 11 fungi (Candida albicans, C tropicalis, C glabrata, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rhodotorula rubra, Cryptococcus neoformans, Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus niger, A fumigatus, A flavus, Acremonium falciforme) were inoculated in a commercial organ culture medium containing a coloured pH indicator (CorneaMax, Eurobio, Les Ulis, France). The real live fungal inoculum was verified immediately after inoculation. After 48 hours at 31 degrees C, samples of the contaminated media were inoculated in three blood bottles: Bactec Aerobic/F, Bactec Mycosis IC/F, and Bactec Myco/F Lytic (Becton Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France), then placed in a Bactec 9240 rocking automat, and in four Sabouraud media (solid and liquid, 28 degrees C and 37 degrees C) with daily observation. Contaminated organ culture media were also checked daily for any change in turbidity and/or colour. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Mycosis IC/F and Myco/F Lytic bottles were neither faster nor more sensitive than the aerobic bottle. The three methods were positive for all inocula, even the lowest (viable inoculum below 10 CFU/ml for each fungus). Contamination was detected within 24 hours by the aerobic bottles in 91% (40/44), by Sabouraud in 98% (43/44) (no significant difference) and by visual inspection in 66% of cases (29/44) (p<0.001 with the two others). Maximum times to detection were 46, 48 and 72 hours respectively.
This study further counters the preconception that fungal contamination is hard to detect in corneal organ culture media. This study is the last step in validating the use of a pair of blood bottles for the sterility testing of organ culture media, this time for fungi. Their use should make it possible to shorten microbiological quarantine and thus deliver corneas with higher endothelial cell density, without increasing the risk of recipient contamination.
背景/目的:器官培养角膜受到真菌污染的后果虽不常见,但对接受者往往是灾难性的。因此,眼库通常会在将角膜用于移植前对其进行10天或更长时间的隔离。这段时间虽然对所提供角膜的内皮细胞密度不利,但使用传统微生物学方法检测污染是必要的。作者之前验证了使用一对需氧和厌氧血培养瓶来灵敏且快速地检测细菌。为了缩短隔离期,仅需优化真菌检测方法。作者旨在比较三种方法检测真菌污染的灵敏度和速度:血培养瓶法、沙氏培养基法和每日对器官培养基进行目视检查法。
将11种真菌(白色念珠菌、热带念珠菌、光滑念珠菌、酿酒酵母、深红酵母、新型隐球菌、尖孢镰刀菌、黑曲霉、烟曲霉、黄曲霉、镰状枝顶孢)的四种接种物(每毫升10⁶、10⁴、10²、10个菌落形成单位(CFU))接种到含有颜色pH指示剂的商业器官培养基中(CorneaMax,Eurobio,法国于利斯)。接种后立即验证实际活真菌接种物。在31℃下培养48小时后,将受污染培养基的样本接种到三个血培养瓶中:Bactec需氧/F瓶、Bactec真菌病IC/F瓶和Bactec Myco/F Lytic瓶(法国贝克顿·迪金森公司,勒蓬德克莱),然后放入Bactec 9240自动摇床中,并接种到四种沙氏培养基(固体和液体,28℃和37℃)中,同时每日进行观察。还每日检查受污染的器官培养基的浊度和/或颜色是否有任何变化。实验重复进行三次。
真菌病IC/F瓶和Myco/F Lytic瓶在速度和灵敏度上均不优于需氧瓶。三种方法对所有接种物均呈阳性,即使是最低接种量(每种真菌的活菌接种量低于10 CFU/ml)。需氧瓶在24小时内检测到污染的比例为91%(40/44),沙氏培养基法为98%(43/44)(无显著差异),目视检查法在66%的病例中检测到污染(29/44)(与其他两种方法相比,p<0.001)。检测的最长时间分别为46、48和72小时。
本研究进一步反驳了在角膜器官培养基中难以检测真菌污染的先入之见。本研究是验证使用一对血培养瓶进行器官培养基无菌检测(此次针对真菌)的最后一步。使用它们应能缩短微生物学隔离期,从而提供内皮细胞密度更高的角膜,同时不增加接受者感染的风险。