• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Admission of patients with severe and moderate traumatic brain injury to specialized ICU facilities: a search for triage criteria.

作者信息

Hukkelhoven Chantal W P M, Steyerberg Ewout W, Habbema J Dik F, Maas Andrew I R

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Center for Clinical Decision Science, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jun;31(6):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2628-y. Epub 2005 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-005-2628-y
PMID:15834705
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether triage for direct admission of patients with traumatic brain injury to a trauma center is facilitated by predicting the risk of potentially removable lesions or raised intracranial pressure (ICP).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Cohort study in a level I university trauma center.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

A prospective cohort of primarily (n=200) and secondarily (n=75) referred patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Predictive characteristics for the risk of surgically removable lesions and the risk of raised ICP (repeatedly > or = 20 mmHg) were identified and included in prognostic models. These models were validated internally with bootstrapping techniques and externally on a historic sample (n=205) regarding discriminative ability (AUC). Among the cohort patients, 67% had raised ICP and 54% had surgically removable lesions. Both outcomes occurred more frequently in patients secondarily referred, but the incidence in patients primarily referred was also high (62% and 33% respectively). No strong predictors of raised ICP were identified. Age and pupillary reactivity were significant predictors of surgically removable lesions. The models discriminated reasonably for surgically removable lesions (AUC=0.78 at development and AUC=0.67 at external validation) but not for raised ICP (AUC=0.59 at development and AUC=0.50 at external validation).

CONCLUSIONS

It is difficult accurately to identify patients in need of specialized intensive care using baseline characteristics. The high incidence of both outcomes in patients primarily referred support direct admission of more and particularly older patients with severe or moderate brain trauma to level I trauma centers.

摘要

相似文献

1
Admission of patients with severe and moderate traumatic brain injury to specialized ICU facilities: a search for triage criteria.
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jun;31(6):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2628-y. Epub 2005 Apr 16.
2
[Value of serial CT scanning and intracranial pressure monitoring for detecting new intracranial mass effect in severe head injury patients showing lesions type I-II in the initial CT scan].[连续CT扫描及颅内压监测对初始CT扫描显示为I-II型病变的重型颅脑损伤患者新出现的颅内占位效应的检测价值]
Neurocirugia (Astur). 2005 Jun;16(3):217-34.
3
Novel methods to predict increased intracranial pressure during intensive care and long-term neurologic outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation in a multicenter dataset.新型方法预测重症监护期间颅内压升高和创伤性脑损伤后的长期神经预后:多中心数据集的开发和验证。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):554-64. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182742d0a.
4
Predicting outcomes after traumatic brain injury: the development and validation of prognostic models based on admission characteristics.预测创伤性脑损伤后的结局:基于入院特征的预后模型的建立和验证。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jul;73(1):137-45. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824b00ac.
5
Prediction of raised intracranial pressure complicating severe traumatic brain injury in children: implications for trial design.儿童重型创伤性脑损伤并发颅内压升高的预测:对试验设计的影响
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;9(1):8-14. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000298759.78616.3A.
6
A clinical prediction model for raised intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injuries.颅脑创伤患者颅内压升高的临床预测模型。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Aug;85(2):380-386. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001965.
7
Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics.预测创伤性脑损伤后的预后:基于入院特征的预后评分的开发与验证
J Neurotrauma. 2005 Oct;22(10):1025-39. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1025.
8
Prognosis in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the IMPACT models and the role of extracranial injuries.中重度创伤性脑损伤的预后:IMPACT 模型的外部验证及颅外损伤的作用。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Feb;74(2):639-46. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827d602e.
9
Predictive value of hyperthermia and intracranial hypertension on neurological outcomes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.高热和颅内高压对重型颅脑损伤患者神经功能预后的预测价值。
Brain Inj. 2015;29(13-14):1642-7. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1075157. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
10
Prognostic models for prediction of outcomes after traumatic brain injury based on patients admission characteristics.基于患者入院特征预测创伤性脑损伤后结局的预后模型。
Brain Inj. 2016;30(4):393-406. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1113568. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Mild or Moderate Acute Subdural Hematomas.与轻、中度急性硬脑膜下血肿患者预后不良相关的因素。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2020 Aug 15;60(8):402-410. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0030. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
2
Diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure in critically ill adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.诊断危重症成人颅内压升高:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 24;366:l4225. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4225.
3
Midline shift in relation to thickness of traumatic acute subdural hematoma predicts mortality.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics.预测创伤性脑损伤后的预后:基于入院特征的预后评分的开发与验证
J Neurotrauma. 2005 Oct;22(10):1025-39. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1025.
2
Regional differences in patient characteristics, case management, and outcomes in traumatic brain injury: experience from the tirilazad trials.
J Neurosurg. 2002 Sep;97(3):549-57. doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.3.0549.
3
Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regression.利用入院变量和生理数据预测创伤性脑损伤患者的恢复情况:决策树分析与逻辑回归的比较
外伤性急性硬膜下血肿厚度相关的中线移位可预测死亡率。
BMC Neurol. 2015 Oct 24;15:220. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0479-x.
4
Prediction of neurosurgical intervention after mild traumatic brain injury using the national trauma data bank.利用国家创伤数据库预测轻度创伤性脑损伤后的神经外科干预
World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Jun 6;10:23. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0017-6. eCollection 2015.
5
Intracranial pressure monitoring: fundamental considerations and rationale for monitoring.颅内压监测:监测的基本考量与理论依据
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21 Suppl 2:S64-84. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0048-y.
6
Derivation of a clinical decision instrument to identify adult patients with mild traumatic intracranial hemorrhage at low risk for requiring ICU admission.临床决策工具的推导,以识别成人轻度创伤性颅内出血患者中低危需要入住 ICU 的患者。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;63(4):448-56.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
7
Variability of ICU use in adult patients with minor traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.轻度创伤性颅内出血成年患者重症监护病房使用情况的变异性
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 May;61(5):509-517.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.08.024. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
8
A clinical decision rule to predict adult patients with traumatic intracranial haemorrhage who do not require intensive care unit admission.一种用于预测成人创伤性颅内出血患者无需入住重症监护病房的临床决策规则。
Injury. 2012 Nov;43(11):1827-32. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.07.020. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
9
Identification of low-risk patients with traumatic brain injury and intracranial hemorrhage who do not need intensive care unit admission.识别无需入住重症监护病房的创伤性脑损伤和颅内出血低风险患者。
J Trauma. 2011 Jun;70(6):E101-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e88bcb.
10
Admission blood glucose is an independent predictive factor for hospital mortality in polytraumatised patients.入院时血糖是多发伤患者医院死亡率的独立预测因素。
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jul;35(7):1234-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1446-z. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
J Neurosurg. 2002 Aug;97(2):326-36. doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.2.0326.
4
Predictors of outcome in head injury: proposal of a new scaling system.头部损伤预后的预测因素:一种新评分系统的提议
J Trauma. 2002 Apr;52(4):667-74. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200204000-00009.
5
Determinants of mortality in patients with severe blunt head injury.重度钝性颅脑损伤患者死亡的决定因素
Arch Surg. 2002 Mar;137(3):285-90. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.3.285.
6
Validation, calibration, revision and combination of prognostic survival models.预后生存模型的验证、校准、修订与合并
Stat Med. 2000 Dec 30;19(24):3401-15. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20001230)19:24<3401::aid-sim554>3.0.co;2-2.
7
Traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤
Lancet. 2000 Sep 9;356(9233):923-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02689-1.
8
Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets.基于逻辑回归分析的预后建模:小数据集中选择方法与估计方法的比较
Stat Med. 2000 Apr 30;19(8):1059-79. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000430)19:8<1059::aid-sim412>3.0.co;2-0.
9
What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?验证一个预后模型是什么意思?
Stat Med. 2000 Feb 29;19(4):453-73. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<453::aid-sim350>3.0.co;2-5.
10
The European Brain Injury Consortium survey of head injuries.欧洲脑损伤协会头部损伤调查
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1999;141(3):223-36. doi: 10.1007/s007010050292.