• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测创伤性脑损伤后的结局:基于入院特征的预后模型的建立和验证。

Predicting outcomes after traumatic brain injury: the development and validation of prognostic models based on admission characteristics.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Sixth People Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jul;73(1):137-45. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824b00ac.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e31824b00ac
PMID:22743383
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early estimation of prognosis for the patient with traumatic brain injury is an important factor in making treatment decisions, resource allocation, classify patients, or communicating with family. We aimed to develop and validate practical prognostic models for mortality at 30 days and for 6 months unfavorable outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury.

METHODS

Retrospectively collected data from our department were used to develop prognostic models for outcome. We developed four prognostic models based on admission predictors with logistic regression analysis. The performance of models was assessed with respect to discrimination and calibration. Discriminative ability was evaluated with C statistic, equal to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Calibrative ability was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (H-L test). The internal validity of models was evaluated with the bootstrap re-sampling technique. We validated three of the models in an external series of 203 patients that collected from another research center. Discrimination and calibration were further assessed to indicate the performance of the models in external patients.

RESULTS

Logistic regression showed that age, pupillary reactivity, motor Glasgow Coma Score, computed tomography characters, glucose, hemoglobin, D-dimer, serum calcium, and intracranial pressure were independent prognostic factors of outcome. The models discriminated well in the development patients (C statistic 0.709-0.939). We extensively validate three of the models. Internal validation showed no overoptimism in any of the models' predictive C statistics. External validity was much better (C statistic 0.844-0.902). Calibration was also good (H-L tests, p > 0.05). Computer-based calculator that based on prognostic models was developed for clinical use.

CONCLUSION

Our validated prognostic models have good performance and are generalizable to be used to predict outcome of new patients. We recommend the use of prognostic models to complement clinical decision making.

摘要

背景

对于创伤性脑损伤患者,早期预后评估是制定治疗决策、资源分配、患者分类或与家属沟通的重要因素。我们旨在开发和验证适用于中重度创伤性脑损伤患者 30 天死亡率和 6 个月不良预后的实用预后模型。

方法

我们使用来自本部门的回顾性数据来开发预后模型。我们基于逻辑回归分析,使用入院预测因子开发了四个预后模型。使用 C 统计量(等于受试者工作特征曲线下的面积)评估模型的区分能力。校准能力通过 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验(H-L 检验)进行评估。模型的内部有效性通过自举重采样技术进行评估。我们在另一个研究中心收集的 203 例外部患者系列中验证了其中三个模型。进一步评估了区分和校准,以表明模型在外部患者中的性能。

结果

逻辑回归显示,年龄、瞳孔反应性、运动格拉斯哥昏迷评分、计算机断层扫描特征、血糖、血红蛋白、D-二聚体、血清钙和颅内压是结局的独立预后因素。这些模型在发展患者中具有良好的区分能力(C 统计量 0.709-0.939)。我们广泛验证了其中三个模型。内部验证表明,任何模型的预测 C 统计量都没有过度乐观。外部有效性要好得多(C 统计量 0.844-0.902)。校准也很好(H-L 检验,p>0.05)。为临床使用开发了基于预后模型的计算机计算器。

结论

我们验证的预后模型具有良好的性能,可推广用于预测新患者的结局。我们建议使用预后模型来补充临床决策。

相似文献

1
Predicting outcomes after traumatic brain injury: the development and validation of prognostic models based on admission characteristics.预测创伤性脑损伤后的结局:基于入院特征的预后模型的建立和验证。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jul;73(1):137-45. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824b00ac.
2
Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics.预测创伤性脑损伤后的预后:基于入院特征的预后评分的开发与验证
J Neurotrauma. 2005 Oct;22(10):1025-39. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1025.
3
Validation of a prognostic score for early mortality in severe head injury cases.严重颅脑损伤病例早期死亡率预后评分的验证
J Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;121(6):1314-22. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS131874. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
4
Prognostic models for prediction of outcomes after traumatic brain injury based on patients admission characteristics.基于患者入院特征预测创伤性脑损伤后结局的预后模型。
Brain Inj. 2016;30(4):393-406. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1113568. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
5
Novel methods to predict increased intracranial pressure during intensive care and long-term neurologic outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation in a multicenter dataset.新型方法预测重症监护期间颅内压升高和创伤性脑损伤后的长期神经预后:多中心数据集的开发和验证。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):554-64. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182742d0a.
6
Prognosis in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the IMPACT models and the role of extracranial injuries.中重度创伤性脑损伤的预后:IMPACT 模型的外部验证及颅外损伤的作用。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Feb;74(2):639-46. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827d602e.
7
Prognostic indicators and outcome prediction model for severe traumatic brain injury.重度创伤性脑损伤的预后指标及结局预测模型
J Trauma. 2009 Feb;66(2):304-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815d9d3f.
8
Impact of thoracic injury on traumatic brain injury outcome.胸部损伤对创伤性脑损伤结局的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 3;8(9):e74204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074204. eCollection 2013.
9
Prognostic value of coagulation tests for in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury.凝血检测对创伤性脑损伤患者住院死亡率的预后价值。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jan 5;26(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0471-0.
10
External validation of the CRASH and IMPACT prognostic models in severe traumatic brain injury.CRASH和IMPACT严重创伤性脑损伤预后模型的外部验证
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Jul 1;31(13):1146-52. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3003. Epub 2014 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for neurosurgical intervention within 48 hours of admission for patients with mild traumatic brain injury and isolated subdural hematoma.轻度创伤性脑损伤合并单纯硬膜下血肿患者入院后48小时内进行神经外科干预的危险因素。
J Neurosurg. 2024 Aug 30;142(2):547-560. doi: 10.3171/2024.5.JNS232476. Print 2025 Feb 1.
2
Association of systemic inflammatory response index and clinical outcome in acute traumatic spinal cord injury patients.全身炎症反应指数与急性创伤性脊髓损伤患者临床结局的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 17;14(1):19085. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69699-4.
3
A Meta-analysis of Predicting Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Models.
机器学习模型预测创伤性脑损伤后意识障碍的Meta分析。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 1;25(3):290-303. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231443. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Plasma D-dimer levels are a biomarker for in-hospital complications and long-term mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury.血浆D-二聚体水平是创伤性脑损伤患者院内并发症和长期死亡率的生物标志物。
Front Mol Neurosci. 2023 Oct 27;16:1276726. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1276726. eCollection 2023.
5
An independently validated nomogram for individualised estimation of short-term mortality risk among patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a modelling analysis of the CENTER-TBI China Registry Study.一种经独立验证的用于个体化评估重型颅脑损伤患者短期死亡风险的列线图:CENTER-TBI中国注册研究的建模分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Apr 28;59:101975. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101975. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Longitudinal D-Dimer Trajectories and the Risk of Mortality in Abdominal Trauma Patients: A Group-Based Trajectory Modeling Analysis.腹部创伤患者的D-二聚体纵向轨迹与死亡风险:基于群体的轨迹建模分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 30;12(3):1091. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031091.
7
Does poor methodological quality of prediction modeling studies translate to poor model performance? An illustration in traumatic brain injury.预测模型研究的方法学质量差是否意味着模型性能不佳?以创伤性脑损伤为例。
Diagn Progn Res. 2022 May 5;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41512-022-00122-0.
8
Cerebral Pulsatility Index and In-Hospital Mortality in Chinese Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.中国创伤性脑损伤患者的脑搏动指数与住院死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 12;11(6):1559. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061559.
9
The Association Between D-dimer Levels and Long-Term Neurological Outcomes of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: An Analysis of a Nationwide Observational Neurotrauma Database in Japan.D-二聚体水平与创伤性脑损伤患者长期神经结局的关联:来自日本全国神经创伤观察性数据库的分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Apr;36(2):483-491. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01329-7. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
10
Predicting the Health-related Quality of Life in Patients Following Traumatic Brain Injury.预测创伤性脑损伤患者的健康相关生活质量。
Surg J (N Y). 2021 Jun 17;7(2):e100-e110. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726426. eCollection 2021 Apr.