Bazzoli Gloria J, Lindrooth Richard C, Hasnain-Wynia Romana, Needleman Jack
Department of Health Administration, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1008 E. Clay St., Grant House, P.O. Box 980203, Richmond, VA 23298-0203, USA.
Inquiry. 2004;41(4):401-17. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.4.401.
The Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 initiated several changes to Medicare payment policy in an effort to slow the growth of hospital Medicare payments and ensure the future of the Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund. Although subsequent federal legislation relaxed some original proposals, restored funds were limited and directed to specific types of hospitals. In addition, these Medicare policy changes came at a time when hospitals faced private sector payment constraints. This paper assesses the short-term effects of the BBA on operations of nonprofit hospitals in the United States and compares these effects to those observed in the early 1980s during implementation of the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS). We found that some operational changes instituted by hospitals facing financial pressures from the BBA were similar to those observed for hospitals that faced pressure from Medicare PPS, including efforts to contain Medicare cost growth, to expand outpatient service provision, and to contain hospital staffing. However, during PPS implementation hospitals experienced declining inpatient use and growing profit margins, whereas post-BBA hospitals experienced growing inpatient use and declining margins.
1997年的《平衡预算法案》(BBA)对医疗保险支付政策进行了多项改革,旨在减缓医疗保险对医院支付的增长速度,并确保医疗保险医院保险信托基金的未来。尽管随后的联邦立法放宽了一些最初的提议,但恢复的资金有限,且被定向用于特定类型的医院。此外,这些医疗保险政策变化发生在医院面临私营部门支付限制之际。本文评估了《平衡预算法案》对美国非营利性医院运营的短期影响,并将这些影响与20世纪80年代初医疗保险预期支付系统(PPS)实施期间所观察到的影响进行比较。我们发现,面临《平衡预算法案》带来的财务压力的医院所进行的一些运营变革,与面临医疗保险预期支付系统压力的医院所观察到的变革类似,包括控制医疗保险成本增长、扩大门诊服务提供以及控制医院人员配备等努力。然而,在预期支付系统实施期间,医院的住院量下降,利润率上升,而在《平衡预算法案》实施后,医院的住院量上升,利润率下降。