• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国,接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者的住院费用大幅高于医疗保险支付金额。

Hospitalization costs for acute myocardial infarction patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States are substantially higher than Medicare payments.

作者信息

Afana Majed, Brinjikji Waleed, Cloft Harry, Salka Samer

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2015 Jan;38(1):13-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.22341. Epub 2014 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1002/clc.22341
PMID:25336401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6711053/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute coronary syndromes account for half of all deaths secondary to cardiovascular disease and represent a significant economic burden in the United States. Therefore, assessing hospitalization costs relative to Medicare reimbursement for these patients is important in understanding the impact of these patients on hospitals. We hypothesized that hospitalization costs for acute myocardial infarction patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were higher than their associated Medicare payments.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we evaluated hospitalization costs for patients treated with PCI from 2001 through 2009 by multiplying hospital charges by the group average cost-to-charge ratio for each patient's hospitalization. Primary end points examined were total hospital costs and trends over time, which were correlated with clinical outcomes and insurance payments. Costs were inflation adjusted with 2009 as the reference year.

RESULTS

Median hospitalization costs of PCI increased from $15 889 (interquartile range [IQR] = $12 057-$21 204) in 2001 to $19 349 (IQR = $14 660-$26 282) in 2009. From 2004 to 2009, inflation-adjusted costs for PCI decreased at a rate of 0.3% per year. In 2009, a total of 265,531 patients received PCI for acute myocardial infarction. Of these, 143 654 were <65 years old, and 121 876 were ≥65 years old. Average 2009 Medicare payments ranged from $9303 to $17 500 depending on the Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRG) billed, leaving hospitals at a loss of anywhere from $4493 to $7940 per patient when comparing costs and reimbursements across all included MS-DRG codes.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalization costs for patients treated with PCI have been stabilizing over the last few years; however, there still remains a significant disparity between Medicare reimbursements and hospitalization costs, which has potential implications on patient outcomes, quality of care, and hospital sustainability.

摘要

背景

急性冠状动脉综合征占心血管疾病所致死亡的一半,在美国构成了巨大的经济负担。因此,评估这些患者的住院费用相对于医疗保险报销情况,对于理解这些患者对医院的影响至关重要。我们假设接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性心肌梗死患者的住院费用高于其相关的医疗保险支付金额。

方法

利用全国住院患者样本,我们通过将医院收费乘以每位患者住院期间的组平均成本与收费比率,评估了2001年至2009年接受PCI治疗的患者的住院费用。所检查的主要终点是总住院费用及随时间的趋势,这些与临床结局和保险支付相关。费用以2009年为基准年进行了通胀调整。

结果

PCI的住院费用中位数从2001年的15889美元(四分位间距[IQR] = 12057 - 21204美元)增至2009年的19349美元(IQR = 14660 - 26282美元)。从2004年到2009年,经通胀调整的PCI费用以每年0.3%的速度下降。2009年,共有265531例患者因急性心肌梗死接受了PCI治疗。其中,143654例年龄小于65岁,121876例年龄大于或等于65岁。根据所计费的医疗保险严重程度诊断相关组(MS - DRG),2009年医疗保险的平均支付金额在9303美元至17500美元之间,在比较所有纳入的MS - DRG编码的成本和报销情况时,医院每位患者亏损4493美元至7940美元不等。

结论

在过去几年中,接受PCI治疗患者的住院费用一直趋于稳定;然而,医疗保险报销与住院费用之间仍存在显著差距,这对患者结局、医疗质量和医院可持续性可能产生影响。

相似文献

1
Hospitalization costs for acute myocardial infarction patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States are substantially higher than Medicare payments.在美国,接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者的住院费用大幅高于医疗保险支付金额。
Clin Cardiol. 2015 Jan;38(1):13-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.22341. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
2
Drivers of Variation in 90-Day Episode Payments After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 90 天内的支付变化的驱动因素。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan;12(1):e006928. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006928.
3
Implications of Payment for Acute Myocardial Infarctions as a 90-Day Bundled Single Episode of Care: A Cost of Illness Analysis.急性心肌梗死90天捆绑式单疗程护理支付的影响:疾病成本分析
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 Nov;6(6):799-809. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00328-4. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes in the US Medicare Program.美国医疗保险计划中慢性肾脏病合并急性冠状动脉综合征患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成本效果分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e019391. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019391. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
5
Impact of Medicare's Bundled Payments Initiative on Patient Selection, Payments, and Outcomes for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.医疗保险捆绑支付计划对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者选择、支付和结果的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Sep;13(9):e006171. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006171. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
6
Costs Associated With Access Site and Same-Day Discharge Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Evaluation of the Current Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Care Pathways in the United States.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 Medicare 受益患者中与入路部位相关的成本和当日出院:对美国当前经皮冠状动脉介入治疗护理路径的评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 27;10(4):342-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.049.
7
Angina and associated healthcare costs following percutaneous coronary intervention: A real-world analysis from a multi-payer database.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的心绞痛及相关医疗费用:来自多支付方数据库的真实世界分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec;88(7):1017-1024. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26365. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
8
Genetic testing in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a cost-effectiveness analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的基因检测:成本效益分析。
J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jan;11(1):81-91. doi: 10.1111/jth.12059.
9
Hospitalization costs for endovascular and surgical treatment of ruptured aneurysms in the United States are substantially higher than Medicare payments.在美国,血管内治疗和手术治疗破裂动脉瘤的住院费用远高于医疗保险支付的费用。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jun;33(6):1037-40. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2938. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
10
Differential time trends of outcomes and costs of care for acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations by ST elevation and type of intervention in the United States, 2001-2011.2001年至2011年美国急性心肌梗死住院治疗的结局及费用随ST段抬高和干预类型的差异时间趋势。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Mar 23;4(3):e001445. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001445.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost per Response of Acthar® Gel vs Standard of Care for the Treatment of Proteinuria in Nephrotic Syndrome Due to Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy Among Adults from the US Healthcare Perspective.从美国医疗保健角度看,Acthar®凝胶与标准治疗方案治疗成人特发性膜性肾病所致肾病综合征蛋白尿的每反应成本。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2025 Aug 6;12(2):50-61. doi: 10.36469/001c.142078. eCollection 2025.
2
Machine learning-driven prediction of medical expenses in triple-vessel PCI patients using feature selection.利用特征选择通过机器学习驱动预测三支血管PCI患者的医疗费用
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12218-6.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Population-Based Multigene Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Prevention.基于人群的多基因检测在乳腺癌和卵巢癌预防中的成本效益。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2356078. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56078.
4
Collagen matricryptin promotes cardiac function by mediating scar formation.胶原基质细胞因子通过介导瘢痕形成促进心脏功能。
Life Sci. 2023 May 15;321:121598. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121598. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
5
Economic Evaluation of Population-Based Mutation Testing across Multiple Countries and Health Systems.多个国家和卫生系统基于人群的突变检测的经济评估。
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jul 17;12(7):1929. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071929.
6
Early vs Late Discharge in Low-Risk ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.低危 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中早期与晚期出院的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Nov;21(11):1360-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.04.030. Epub 2020 May 1.
7
Acute and 1-Year Hospitalization Costs for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From the TRANSLATE-ACS Registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的急性和 1 年住院费用:来自 TRANSLATE-ACS 登记研究的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Apr 16;8(8):e011322. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011322.
8
Effects of captopril and valsartan on ventricular remodeling and inflammatory cytokines after interventional therapy for AMI.卡托普利和缬沙坦对急性心肌梗死介入治疗后心室重构及炎性细胞因子的影响
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Oct;16(4):3579-3583. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6626. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
9
Effects of tirofiban on stent thrombosis, Hs-CRP, IL-6 and sICAM-1 after PCI of acute myocardial infarction.替罗非班对急性心肌梗死PCI术后支架内血栓形成、超敏C反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6和可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1的影响。
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Oct;16(4):3383-3388. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6589. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
10
Value-Based ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care Using Risk-Guided Triage and Early Discharge.基于价值的ST段抬高型心肌梗死护理:采用风险导向分诊和早期出院
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e004553. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004553.

本文引用的文献

1
Deaths: preliminary data for 2009.死亡情况:2009年初步数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011 Mar;59(4):1-51.
2
Meta-analysis of randomized trials on access site selection for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗穿刺部位选择的随机试验荟萃分析
Arch Med Sci. 2014 May 12;10(2):203-12. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2014.42570. Epub 2014 May 13.
3
Long-term impact of medicare payment reductions on patient outcomes.医疗保险支付削减对患者结局的长期影响。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct;49(5):1596-615. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12185. Epub 2014 May 20.
4
Systematic use of transradial PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a call to "arms".经桡动脉入路行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的系统应用:“号召”。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1145-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.002.
5
Reductions in Medicare payments and patient outcomes: an analysis of 5 leading Medicare conditions.医疗保险支付减少与患者结果:对 5 种主要医疗保险条件的分析。
Med Care. 2013 Nov;51(11):970-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a98337.
6
How do hospitals cope with sustained slow growth in Medicare prices?医院如何应对医疗保险价格持续缓慢增长?
Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb;49(1):11-31. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12101. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
7
Costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.经桡动脉入路经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成本。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):827-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
8
Comparison of costs between transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort analysis from the Premier research database.经桡动脉与经股动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成本比较:来自 Premier 研究数据库的队列分析。
Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):303-9.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
9
Cost effectiveness of radial access for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention.经桡动脉入路行诊断性心导管检查和冠状动脉介入治疗的成本效果分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct 1;82(4):E375-84. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24696. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
10
Hospitalization costs for endovascular and surgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in the United States are substantially higher than medicare payments.在美国,未破裂脑动脉瘤的血管内治疗和手术治疗的住院费用明显高于医疗保险支付额。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jan;33(1):49-51. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2739. Epub 2011 Oct 27.