Mora-Macià J, Ocón Pujadas J
Servicio de Nefrología, Fundación Puigvert, Barcelona.
Med Clin (Barc). 1992 Mar 7;98(9):321-4.
The aim of this study was to test two of the same models of portable automatic devices for monitoring blood pressure over 24 hours. These devices were the Spacelabs 5200 (Kontron 1 and Kontron 2).
A mercury shygmomanometer was used as reference measurer. To validate Kontron 1, 22 persons (10 males and 12 females) of 45 +/- 12 years of age were selected. For Kontron 2, 25 subjects (12 males and 13 females) of 44 +/- 17 years of age were chosen.
The results expressed as arithmetic mean and standard deviation were (manual vs Kontron 1); systolic blood pressure (SBP) 139 +/- 19 mmHg vs 135 +/- 16 mmHg, p less than 0.05; diastolic (DBP) 96 +/- 12 mmHg vs 93 +/- 12 mmHg, p less than 0.05, heart rate (HR) 77 +/- 13 ppm vs 76 +/- 14 ppm, NS. The correlation between the two methods was: SBP r = 0.870; DBP r = 0.875 and HR r = 0.949. The results of Kontron 2 were: SBP 137 +/- 17 mmHg vs 130 +/- 15 mmHg, p less than 0.05; DBP 93 +/- 11 mmHg vs 94 +/- 11 mmHg, NS; HR 75 +/- 10 ppm vs 73 +/- 12 ppm, NS. The correlations were: SBPr = 0.820; DBP r = 0.877 and HR r = 0.847.
The Spacelabs 5200 automatic blood pressure monitoring underestimates systolic blood pressure while diastolic blood pressure and heart rate are reliable according to international norms.
本研究的目的是测试两款相同型号的便携式自动24小时血压监测设备。这些设备是太空实验室5200(康强1号和康强2号)。
使用汞柱式血压计作为参考测量工具。为验证康强1号,选取了22名年龄在45±12岁的受试者(10名男性和12名女性)。对于康强2号,选择了25名年龄在44±17岁的受试者(12名男性和13名女性)。
结果以算术平均值和标准差表示(手动测量与康强1号对比);收缩压(SBP)139±19mmHg对135±16mmHg,p<0.05;舒张压(DBP)96±12mmHg对93±12mmHg,p<0.05,心率(HR)77±13次/分钟对76±14次/分钟,无显著性差异(NS)。两种测量方法之间的相关性为:收缩压r=0.870;舒张压r=0.875,心率r=0.949。康强2号的结果为:收缩压137±17mmHg对130±15mmHg,p<0.05;舒张压93±11mmHg对94±11mmHg,无显著性差异;心率75±10次/分钟对73±12次/分钟,无显著性差异。相关性为:收缩压r=0.820;舒张压r=0.877,心率r=0.847。
太空实验室5200自动血压监测会低估收缩压,而舒张压和心率根据国际标准是可靠的。