Clark S, Fowlie S, Coats A, Radaelli A, van der Putt M, Bird R, Conway J
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Apr;5(2):77-82.
The accuracy of the TM-2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor (A&D Co, Japan) has been assessed by the indirect method according to the recommendations of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). Ninety subjects (43 men and 47 women), aged 19-89 with a range of systolic blood pressures (SBP) of 81-211 mmHg and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) of 32-113 mmHg were studied. The monitor was compared with two observers using the Hawksley random zero sphygomomanometer. The standard deviation of the difference (SDD) between the observers was 3.0 mmHg for SBP and 2.3 mmHg for DBP. The mean differences between observers were -0.31 mmHg for SBP and 0.32 mmHg for DBP (both NS). The average of three readings for each subject recorded by the monitor was compared with the average of the simultaneous readings by the observers. The SDD was 7.2 mmHg for SBP and 5.5 mmHg for DBP (within the recommendations for accuracy). The differences between methods were -0.98 mmHg for SBP and 0.18 mmHg for DBP; these differences were not significant (NS). The monitor was also assessed against direct intra-brachial artery pressure in 12 subjects (36 readings). The mean difference between the monitor and simultaneous individual intra-arterial reading was -9.5 mmHg for SBP (P less than 0.001) and 3.7 mmHg for DBP (P less than 0.001). The SDD's between methods were 12 mmHg for SBP and 5.0 mmHg for DBP. Use of the monitor in general clinical practice in 100 patients was also assessed. The rate of errors was low (6.8%), and the device found to be acceptable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
已根据美国医疗仪器促进协会(AAMI)的建议,采用间接法对TM - 2420动态血压监测仪(日本A&D公司)的准确性进行了评估。研究对象为90名受试者(43名男性和47名女性),年龄在19 - 89岁之间,收缩压(SBP)范围为81 - 211 mmHg,舒张压(DBP)范围为32 - 113 mmHg。使用Hawksley随机零血压计将该监测仪与两名观察者的测量结果进行比较。观察者之间收缩压的差异标准差(SDD)为3.0 mmHg,舒张压为2.3 mmHg。观察者之间收缩压的平均差异为 - 0.31 mmHg,舒张压为0.32 mmHg(均无统计学意义)。将监测仪记录的每个受试者三次读数的平均值与观察者同时读数的平均值进行比较。收缩压的SDD为7.2 mmHg,舒张压为5.5 mmHg(在准确性建议范围内)。两种方法之间收缩压的差异为 - 0.98 mmHg,舒张压为0.18 mmHg;这些差异无统计学意义。还对12名受试者(36次读数)的肱动脉直接血压进行了评估。监测仪与同时的个体动脉内读数之间收缩压的平均差异为 - 9.5 mmHg(P < 0.001),舒张压为3.7 mmHg(P < 0.001)。两种方法之间收缩压的SDD为12 mmHg,舒张压为5.0 mmHg。还评估了该监测仪在100名患者的一般临床实践中的使用情况。错误率较低(6.8%),且该设备被认为是可接受的。(摘要截取自250字)