Perkell Joseph S, Matthies Melanie L, Tiede Mark, Lane Harlan, Zandipour Majid, Marrone Nicole, Stockmann Ellen, Guenther Frank H
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139-4307, USA.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Dec;47(6):1259-69. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/095).
This study examines individual differences in producing the sibilant contrast in American English and the relation of those differences to 2 speaker characteristics: (a) use of a quantal biomechanical effect (called a "saturation effect") in producing the sibilants and (b) performance on a test of sibilant discrimination. Twenty participants produced the sibilants /s/ and /S/ in normal-, clear-, and fast-speaking conditions. The degree to which the participants used a saturation effect in producing /s/ and /S/ was assessed with a custom-made sensor that measured contact of the underside of the tongue tip with the lower alveolar ridge; such contact normally occurs during the production of /s/ but not /S/. The acuteness of the participants' discrimination of the sibilant contrast was measured using the ABX paradigm and synthesized sibilants. Differences among speakers in the degree of acoustic contrast between /s/ and /S/ that they produced proved related to differences among them in their use of contact contrastively and in their discriminative performance. The most distinct sibilant productions were obtained from participants who used contact in producing /s/ but not /S/ and who had high discrimination scores. The participants who did not use contact differentially when producing the 2 sibilants and who also discriminated the synthetic sibilants less well produced the least distinct sibilant contrasts. Intermediate degrees of sibilant contrast were found with participants who used contact differentially or discriminated well. These findings are compatible with a model of speech motor planning in which goals for phonemic speech movements are in somatosensory and auditory spaces.
本研究考察了美国英语中齿擦音对比发音的个体差异,以及这些差异与两种说话者特征之间的关系:(a)在发出齿擦音时使用一种量子生物力学效应(称为“饱和效应”);(b)在齿擦音辨别测试中的表现。20名参与者在正常语速、清晰语速和快速语速条件下发出齿擦音/s/和/ʃ/。使用定制传感器评估参与者在发出/s/和/ʃ/时使用饱和效应的程度,该传感器测量舌尖底部与下牙槽嵴的接触情况;这种接触通常在发出/s/时出现,而发出/ʃ/时不会出现。使用ABX范式和合成齿擦音测量参与者对齿擦音对比的辨别敏锐度。他们发出的/s/和/ʃ/之间的声学对比程度在说话者之间的差异,被证明与他们在对比使用接触以及辨别表现方面的差异有关。最清晰的齿擦音发音来自那些在发出/s/时使用接触而发出/ʃ/时不使用接触且辨别分数较高的参与者。在发出这两个齿擦音时没有差异地使用接触且对合成齿擦音辨别能力较差的参与者,发出的齿擦音对比最不清晰。在有差异地使用接触或辨别能力较好的参与者中发现了中等程度的齿擦音对比。这些发现与一种言语运动规划模型相符,在该模型中,音素言语运动的目标存在于体感和听觉空间中。