Van Allan R J, Katz M D, Johnson M B, Laine L A, Liu Y, Ralls P W
Department of Radiology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90033.
Radiology. 1992 Jun;183(3):827-30. doi: 10.1148/radiology.183.3.1584941.
The performance of therapeutic aspiration in the treatment of amebic liver abscess, advocated and practiced in many centers, is controversial. Previously, this practice has been evaluated in retrospective analyses. To test the potential benefit of therapeutic aspiration, the authors undertook a prospective randomized trial in 57 patients admitted for suspected amebic liver abscess during a 15-month period. Sixteen patients were excluded from the trial. The remaining 41 patients were randomly included in one of two study groups to receive amebicidal therapy alone or amebicidal therapy coupled with image-guided percutaneous therapeutic aspiration. All patients in the trial recovered. No statistically significant benefit was demonstrated in the aspiration group for the two objective parameters evaluated: length of hospitalization and duration of time to becoming afebrile. Subjective improvement in symptoms after aspiration was greater in the aspiration group at a marginally statistically significant level. These data do not support the adjunctive performance of percutaneous therapeutic aspiration in the treatment of uncomplicated amebic liver abscess. Amebicidals alone were equally efficacious in treating the group studied.
在许多中心提倡并实施的治疗性穿刺术在治疗阿米巴肝脓肿方面存在争议。此前,这种做法已在回顾性分析中得到评估。为了测试治疗性穿刺术的潜在益处,作者在15个月期间对57例因疑似阿米巴肝脓肿入院的患者进行了一项前瞻性随机试验。16例患者被排除在试验之外。其余41例患者被随机纳入两个研究组之一,分别接受单纯抗阿米巴治疗或抗阿米巴治疗联合影像引导下经皮治疗性穿刺术。试验中的所有患者均康复。对于所评估的两个客观参数:住院时间和退热时间,穿刺组未显示出统计学上的显著益处。穿刺组在穿刺后症状的主观改善在统计学上有轻微显著差异,改善程度更大。这些数据不支持在治疗非复杂性阿米巴肝脓肿时采用经皮治疗性穿刺术作为辅助治疗方法。单纯使用抗阿米巴药物在治疗所研究的患者组时同样有效。