Vandenberghe Hans, Van Casteren Viviane, Jonckheer Pascale, Lafontaine Marie-France, De Clercq Etienne
Scientific Institute of Public Health (IPH), Unit of Epidemiology J. Wytsmanstraat 14, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;110:35-41.
The paper tackles the topic of collecting data from home visits using the electronic patient record (EPR) of general practitioners (GPs), in a context with a high proportion of home visits in primary care. Since data from home visits, representing about 40% of GPs' consultations in Belgium, are rather scarcely recorded in the EPR, we wanted to study the impact of not taking into account home visits for quality assessment in primary care. Five quality indicators, which measured the accordance of the delivered care with guidelines on the management of osteoarthritis, were compared between a pooled database (consultations and home visits) and a restricted database (after removal of home visits). Our findings suggest that removing home visits from a database collected from primary care may provide a slight modification of the estimate of the quality of care, whereas conclusions on quality improvement remain relatively stable. Quality of care assessment with the EPR of GPs seems not to be dramatically hampered by the poor recording rate of home visits in the EPR.
在初级医疗中家访比例较高的背景下,本文探讨了利用全科医生(GP)的电子病历(EPR)从家访中收集数据的主题。由于在家访中产生的数据(约占比利时全科医生会诊的40%)在电子病历中记录得相当少,我们想研究在初级医疗质量评估中不考虑家访的影响。在一个汇总数据库(会诊和家访)和一个受限数据库(去除家访后)之间,比较了五个衡量所提供护理与骨关节炎管理指南一致性的质量指标。我们的研究结果表明,从初级医疗收集的数据库中去除家访可能会对护理质量的估计产生轻微改变,而关于质量改进的结论仍然相对稳定。全科医生电子病历对护理质量的评估似乎不会因电子病历中家访记录率低而受到严重阻碍。