Dubberley J H, Faber K J, Patterson S D, Garvin G, Bennett J, Romano W, MacDermid J C, King G J W
University of Western Ontario, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, Ontario N6A 4L6, Canada.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 May;87(5):684-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.14851.
Our aim was to determine the clinical value of MRI and CT arthrography in predicting the presence of loose bodies in the elbow. A series of 26 patients with mechanical symptoms in the elbow had plain radiography, MRI and CT arthrography, followed by routine arthroscopy of the elbow. The location and number of loose bodies determined by MRI and CT arthrography were recorded. Pre-operative plain radiography, MRI and CT arthrography were compared with arthroscopy. Both MRI and CT arthrography had excellent sensitivity (92% to 100%) but low to moderate specificity (15% to 77%) in identifying posteriorly-based loose bodies. Neither MRI nor CT arthrography was consistently sensitive (46% to 91%) or specific (13% to 73%) in predicting the presence or absence of loose bodies anteriorly. The overall sensitivity for the detection of loose bodies in either compartment was 88% to 100% and the specificity 20% to 70%. Pre-operative radiography had a similar sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 71%, respectively. Our results suggest that neither CT arthrography nor MRI is reliable or accurate enough to be any more effective than plain radiography alone in patients presenting with mechanical symptoms in the elbow.
我们的目的是确定MRI和CT关节造影在预测肘部游离体存在方面的临床价值。对26例有肘部机械性症状的患者进行了X线平片、MRI和CT关节造影检查,随后进行了常规肘部关节镜检查。记录由MRI和CT关节造影确定的游离体位置和数量。将术前X线平片、MRI和CT关节造影与关节镜检查结果进行比较。在识别后位游离体方面,MRI和CT关节造影均具有出色的敏感性(92%至100%),但特异性较低至中等(15%至77%)。在预测前方游离体的存在与否方面,MRI和CT关节造影均未表现出持续一致的敏感性(46%至91%)或特异性(13%至73%)。检测任一关节腔游离体的总体敏感性为88%至100%,特异性为20%至70%。术前X线平片的敏感性和特异性分别为84%和71%,与之相似。我们的结果表明,对于有肘部机械性症状的患者,CT关节造影和MRI均不够可靠或准确,不比单独的X线平片更有效。