Baak Jan P, Mutter George L, Robboy Stanley, van Diest Paul J, Uyterlinde Anne M, Orbo Anne, Palazzo Juan, Fiane Bent, Løvslett Kjell, Burger Curt, Voorhorst Feja, Verheijen René H
Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Cancer. 2005 Jun 1;103(11):2304-12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21058.
The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of disease progression prediction of the molecular genetics and morphometry-based Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia (EIN) and World Health Organization 1994 (WHO94) classification systems in patients with endometrial hyperplasias.
A multicenter, multivariate analysis was conducted on 477 patients with endometrial hyperplasia who were required to have a 1-year minimum disease-free interval from the time of the index biopsy (1-18 years of follow-up). The results from that analysis were compared with the results from 197 patients who had < 1 year of follow-up.
Twenty-four of 477 hyperplasias (5.0%) progressed to malignant disease over an average of 4 years (maximum, 10 years). According to the WHO94 classification, 16 of 123 atypical hyperplasias (13%) and 8 of 354 nonatypical hyperplasias (2.3%) progressed (hazard ratio [HR] = 7). Twenty-two of 118 EINs (19%) and 2 of 359 non-EINs (0.6%) progressed (HR = 45). EIN was prognostic within each WHO94 subcategory. Progression rates were 3% in simple hyperplasias, 22% in complex hyperplasias, 17% in simple atypical hyperplasias, and 38% in complex atypical hyperplasias with EIN, compared with progression rates of 0.0-2.0% in all hyperplasias if EIN was absent. EIN detected precancerous lesions (sensitivity, 92%) better than WHO94 atypical hyperplasias collectively (67%) or complex atypical hyperplasias alone (46%). In a Cox regression analysis, EIN was the strongest prognostic index of future endometrial carcinoma. The same was true for patients with < 1 year of follow-up (HR for EIN, atypical hyperplasia, and complex atypical hyperplasia: 58, 7, and 8, respectively).
The EIN classification system predicted disease progression more accurately than the WHO94 classification and identified many women with benign changes that would have been regarded as high risk according to the WHO94 classification system.
本研究的目的是比较分子遗传学和基于形态学的子宫内膜上皮内瘤变(EIN)分类系统与世界卫生组织1994年(WHO94)分类系统对子宫内膜增生患者疾病进展预测的准确性。
对477例子宫内膜增生患者进行了多中心、多变量分析,这些患者自索引活检时起至少有1年无病间隔(随访1 - 18年)。将该分析结果与197例随访时间不足1年的患者的结果进行比较。
477例增生患者中有24例(5.0%)在平均4年(最长10年)内进展为恶性疾病。根据WHO94分类,123例非典型增生中有16例(13%)和354例非非典型增生中有8例(2.3%)进展(风险比[HR]=7)。118例EIN中有22例(19%)和359例非EIN中有2例(0.6%)进展(HR = 45)。在WHO94的每个亚类中,EIN都具有预后价值。单纯增生的进展率为3%,复杂增生为22%,单纯非典型增生为17%,伴有EIN的复杂非典型增生为38%,而若无EIN,所有增生的进展率为0.0 - 2.0%。EIN检测癌前病变的能力(敏感性为92%)优于WHO94总体非典型增生(67%)或单独的复杂非典型增生(46%)。在Cox回归分析中,EIN是未来子宫内膜癌最强的预后指标。随访时间不足1年的患者情况相同(EIN、非典型增生和复杂非典型增生的HR分别为58、7和8)。
EIN分类系统比WHO94分类系统更准确地预测疾病进展,并识别出许多根据WHO94分类系统会被视为高危的良性病变女性。