Llorca P-M, Azorin J-M, Despiegel N, Verpillat P
Centre Medico-Psychologique B, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Int J Clin Pract. 2005 Mar;59(3):268-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00440.x.
Escitalopram is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for major depressive disorder in both primary and specialist settings. This analysis compared the efficacy of escitalopram with citalopram in the treatment of patients with severe depression [defined as a score of > or =30 Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)]. Data from three clinical trials were used for this pooled analysis. A total of 506 severely depressed patients were included (169 received escitalopram, 171 citalopram and 166 placebo). Mean change from baseline in MADRS total scores (primary efficacy parameter) was significantly higher in the escitalopram-treated group compared with the citalopram-treated group (p = 0.003). There was a significant difference in response between escitalopram and citalopram (56 vs. 41%, respectively, p = 0.007). Results from secondary efficacy parameters (Hamilton rating for depression and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement and Severity scales) were consistent with previous results. The benefits in severe depression of escitalopram vs. citalopram were so demonstrated.
艾司西酞普兰在初级和专科环境中都是治疗重度抑郁症的一种有效且耐受性良好的疗法。本分析比较了艾司西酞普兰与西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症患者(定义为蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)评分≥30分)的疗效。三项临床试验的数据用于此次汇总分析。总共纳入了506名重度抑郁症患者(169名接受艾司西酞普兰治疗,171名接受西酞普兰治疗,166名接受安慰剂治疗)。与西酞普兰治疗组相比,艾司西酞普兰治疗组的MADRS总分(主要疗效参数)从基线的平均变化显著更高(p = 0.003)。艾司西酞普兰和西酞普兰之间的缓解率存在显著差异(分别为56%和41%,p = 0.007)。次要疗效参数(汉密尔顿抑郁量表以及临床总体印象改善和严重程度量表)的结果与先前结果一致。由此证明了艾司西酞普兰相对于西酞普兰在重度抑郁症治疗中的益处。