Cech O, Dzupa V
Ortopedicko-traumatologická klinika 3. LF UK a FNKV, Praha.
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005;72(1):57-76.
The development of the European total hip arthroplasty in the sixties of 20th century is associated mainly with the names of G. K. McKee, J. Charnley and M. E. Muller. The SICOT meeting in Paris in 1966 introduced THA as a new method of treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip and paved the way for the commercialization of the manufacturing of prostheses. The success of this method consisted primarily in the fixation of individual components by bone cement and application of metal-to-polyethylene and metal-to-metal joints. The book presents these historical events as they have been reflected in the development of THA in the countries of the former Czechoslovakia and in the development of implants of domestic provenance. The development of THA in the former Czechoslovakia started in 1969 and was based on the Swiss school established by M. E. Muller. The Muller component with the "banana-shaped" stem was implanted using the Watson-Jones approach, the proximal femur canal was prepared by a rasp and the Palacos cement was used. This prosthesis served also as the model for the first Czech implant Poldi-Cech of I generation (the Chirulen cup available in three sizes, the "banana- shaped" femoral component with a 32 mm head-diameter and 130 degree neck-shaft angle) the development of which started in 1969 and the serial production began in 1972 in the Poldi Kladno steel company. Fatigue fractures of the "banana-shaped" stem led to the development of the concept of a femoral component with an "anatomical" stem. In Switzerland, this concept was developed by B. G. Weber. In the former Czechoslovakia the development of a new femoral component with an "anatomical" stem following the shape of the intramedullary canal with an ovoid profile and without sharp edges started in 1972. Due to the incidence of fatigue fractures of the "banana-shaped"stem and material that was not sufficiently strong (steel used for the production of osteosynthetic components), 144 degree neck-shaft angle was chosen. Reduction of the effect of bending forces on the valgus stem had eliminated fatigue fractures. This Poldi-Cech prosthesis of II generation was provided in nine sizes. The diameter of the head remained the same. Three Chirulen cups were supplemented with a "flat" cup for implantation in a dysplastic acetabulum. The prosthesis was implanted with an exact instrument set (reamer for acetabular preparation, rasp for proximal femoral preparation, alignment device for accurate positioning of both the cup and the femoral component) with the use of the Palacos cement. The production of the Poldi-Cech prosthesis of II. generation started in 1974 with the fabrication of a monoblock. Since 1986 it has been developed into a modular system (14/16 cone) with the possibility to use a ceramic head of 32 mm diameter (only in the nineties the cone size was changed to 12/14 and the heads were provided also in the 28 mm diameter). The Poldi-Cech prosthesis of II generation with the "anatomical" stem has been implanted since 1974 (i. e. during 30 years) in more than 140 000 patients in the Czech and Slovak Republics. In the same year cemented monoblock hemiarthroplasty was developed on the same basis as THA using the same "anatomical" stem and 36 to 60mm head diameter. Until now more than 35,000 of these hemiarthroplasty systems have been implanted. Until 1992 the Poldi-Cech implant was practically the only available cemented total hip replacement in the former Czechoslovakia and retrospectively it may be considered a highly successful implant. In the authors' view, the further development of THA will lead in the following years to the use of implants proved by a long-term follow-up. Preference will be given to prostheses the implantation of which will require a minimal loss of the bone stock during primary surgery and which will allow a technically easy reimplantation. The continental Europe has been recently preferring hybrid prostheses while Scandinavia witnesses an evident increase in the number of implanted cemented prostheses to the detriment of the cementless and hybrid ones. Naturally, cementless prostheses will keep dominating in young patients.
20世纪60年代欧洲全髋关节置换术的发展主要与G.K.麦基、J.查恩利和M.E.米勒的名字相关。1966年在巴黎召开的国际矫形与创伤外科学会(SICOT)会议将全髋关节置换术作为治疗髋关节骨关节炎的一种新方法引入,并为假体制造的商业化铺平了道路。这种方法的成功主要在于通过骨水泥固定各个组件以及应用金属对聚乙烯和金属对金属关节。本书呈现了这些历史事件,它们在前捷克斯洛伐克国家全髋关节置换术的发展以及国产植入物的发展中得到了体现。前捷克斯洛伐克的全髋关节置换术始于1969年,以M.E.米勒建立的瑞士学派为基础。使用沃森-琼斯入路植入带有“香蕉形”柄的米勒组件,并通过锉刀准备股骨近端髓腔,使用帕拉科斯骨水泥。这种假体也作为第一代捷克植入物波尔迪-切赫的模型(奇鲁伦髋臼杯有三种尺寸,“香蕉形”股骨组件头直径为32毫米且颈干角为130度)其研发始于1969年,1972年在波尔迪克拉德诺钢铁公司开始批量生产。“香蕉形”柄的疲劳骨折促使了具有“解剖形”柄股骨组件概念的发展。在瑞士,这一概念由B.G.韦伯提出并发展。在前捷克斯洛伐克1972年开始研发一种新的具有“解剖形”柄的股骨组件,其形状遵循髓腔轮廓呈椭圆形且无尖锐边缘,并选择了144度颈干角。减少外翻柄上弯曲力的影响消除了疲劳骨折。这种第二代波尔迪-切赫假体有九种尺寸。头部直径保持不变,并为三种奇鲁伦髋臼杯补充了一种“扁平”杯,用于发育不良髋臼的植入手术中。使用帕拉科斯骨水泥,通过精确的器械套装(髋臼准备用扩孔钻、股骨近端准备用锉刀、用于精确放置髋臼杯和股骨组件的对准装置)植入假体。第二代波尔迪-切赫假体于1974年开始生产整体式产品,自1986年起发展为模块化系统(14/16锥度),可以使用直径32毫米的陶瓷头(仅在90年代锥度尺寸改为12/14且头部也提供28毫米直径)。自1974年以来(即30年间),带有“解剖形”柄的第二代波尔迪-切赫假体已在捷克和斯洛伐克共和国超过140000名患者中植入使用。同年基于与全髋关节置换术相同的基础,采用相同的“解剖形”柄和36至60毫米头直径,研发了骨水泥固定的整体式半髋关节置换术。到目前为止,已植入超过35000套这种半髋关节置换系统。直到1992年,波尔迪-切赫植入物实际上是前捷克斯洛伐克唯一可用的骨水泥固定全髋关节置换产品,回顾来看它可被视为一种非常成功的植入物。在作者看来,全髋关节置换术未来几年的进一步发展将导致使用经长期随访验证的植入物。将优先选择那些在初次手术中骨量损失最小且技术上便于再次植入手术的假体。欧洲大陆最近倾向于混合式假体,而斯堪的纳维亚地区植入的骨水泥固定假体数量明显增加,不利于非骨水泥固定和混合式假体。自然地,非骨水泥固定假体在年轻患者中仍将占据主导地位。