Lee Douglas S, Vasan Ramachandran S
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes, Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01702-5827, USA.
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2005 May;20(3):201-10. doi: 10.1097/01.hco.0000161832.04952.6a.
This paper reviews recent advances in heart failure biomarkers for identification of disease precursors, subclinical disease, and onset or progression of overt disease.
Heart failure biomarkers can be categorized empirically as neurohormonal mediators, markers of myocyte injury and remodeling, and indicators of systemic inflammation. Brain natriuretic peptide is the most widely studied, with a potentially important but evolving role for determining prognosis and as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials. Strong evidence exists for use of brain natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of acute heart failure and for improved clinical outcomes with a brain natriuretic peptide-guided approach to heart failure care. The use of brain natriuretic peptide as a screening tool for asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, or to distinguish systolic from diastolic heart failure, is not supported by current data. Markers of myocyte injury, including troponins, heart-type fatty acid binding protein, and myosin light chain-1, may further improve heart failure prognostication in conjunction with plasma brain natriuretic peptide. Biomarkers of matrix remodeling and inflammation have emerged as potential preclinical indicators to identify individuals at risk of developing clinical heart failure. A role for cellular adhesion molecules may also emerge in identifying those at risk for cardiovascular thrombotic complications, such as stroke.
The spectrum of heart failure biomarkers and their potential clinical applications continues to grow. Ongoing research on multimarker strategies will likely identify biomarker combinations that are optimal at various stages during the evolution of heart failure, ranging from their use for screening, diagnosis, determining prognosis, and guiding management.
本文综述了心力衰竭生物标志物在疾病前驱期、亚临床疾病以及显性疾病发作或进展识别方面的最新进展。
心力衰竭生物标志物可根据经验分为神经激素介质、心肌损伤和重塑标志物以及全身炎症指标。脑钠肽是研究最广泛的,在确定预后方面具有潜在的重要但仍在演变的作用,并且作为临床试验中的替代终点。有强有力的证据支持使用脑钠肽诊断急性心力衰竭,以及采用脑钠肽指导的心力衰竭护理方法可改善临床结局。目前的数据不支持将脑钠肽用作无症状左心室收缩功能障碍的筛查工具,或用于区分收缩性心力衰竭和舒张性心力衰竭。包括肌钙蛋白、心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白和肌球蛋白轻链 -1 在内的心肌损伤标志物,可能与血浆脑钠肽一起进一步改善心力衰竭的预后。基质重塑和炎症的生物标志物已成为识别有发生临床心力衰竭风险个体的潜在临床前指标。细胞粘附分子在识别有心血管血栓并发症(如中风)风险的个体中也可能发挥作用。
心力衰竭生物标志物的范围及其潜在的临床应用不断扩大。正在进行的关于多标志物策略的研究可能会确定在心力衰竭演变的各个阶段最优化的生物标志物组合,从用于筛查、诊断、确定预后到指导管理。