Wright W G, McCance E F, Lu T, Carew T J
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520.
Behav Neural Biol. 1992 Mar;57(2):170-4. doi: 10.1016/0163-1047(92)90689-2.
A recent study of the development of nonassociative learning in the siphon withdrawal reflex of Aplysia showed that dishabituation (facilitation of an habituated response) and sensitization (facilitation of a nonhabituated response) emerge according to different developmental timetables: dishabituation precedes sensitization by approximately 60 days (Rankin & Carew, 1988). Both forms of facilitation of the reflex were observed within 90 s of an electrical shock to the tail. However, more recent work by Marcus and colleagues (1988) in adult animals revealed that sensitization can have a delayed onset of 20-30 min after a strong tail shock. Since the developmental study of Rankin and Carew (1988) only tested the reflex for 10 min after tail shock, it is possible that sensitization was in fact present at earlier developmental stages, but was undetected. To examine this question, in the present study we utilized a longer (40-50 min) post-shock observation period to determine whether delayed-onset sensitization is exhibited in juvenile Aplysia, and if so, when it is expressed during development. In our first experiment, we found that Early Stage 12 juveniles (80-95 days after metamorphosis) showed significant delayed-onset sensitization 30-50 min after a strong tail shock. In a second experiment, we found that delayed-onset sensitization was absent in Stage 11 animals (20-70 days after metamorphosis). Thus delayed-onset sensitization emerges in Early Stage 12. The fact that the birthdate of delayed-onset sensitization is at least 30 days after that of dishabituation (Rankin & Carew, 1987, 1988) supports the hypothesis that these two forms of nonassociative learning may have at least partly different underlying mechanisms.
最近一项关于海兔虹吸管退缩反射中非联合性学习发展的研究表明,去习惯化(习惯化反应的促进)和敏感化(非习惯化反应的促进)按照不同的发育时间表出现:去习惯化比敏感化早出现约60天(兰金和卡鲁,1988年)。在对尾部进行电击后的90秒内观察到了这两种反射促进形式。然而,马库斯及其同事(1988年)对成年动物的最新研究表明,强烈的尾部电击后,敏感化可能有20 - 30分钟的延迟发作。由于兰金和卡鲁(1988年)的发育研究在尾部电击后仅测试了10分钟的反射,所以有可能敏感化实际上在更早的发育阶段就已存在,但未被检测到。为了研究这个问题,在本研究中我们采用了更长的(40 - 50分钟)电击后观察期,以确定幼年海兔是否表现出延迟发作的敏感化,如果是,它在发育过程中的何时出现。在我们的第一个实验中,我们发现12期早期的幼体(变态后80 - 95天)在强烈的尾部电击后30 - 50分钟表现出显著的延迟发作敏感化。在第二个实验中,我们发现11期动物(变态后20 - 70天)没有延迟发作敏感化。因此,延迟发作敏感化出现在12期早期。延迟发作敏感化的出现日期比去习惯化至少晚30天(兰金和卡鲁,1987年,1988年),这一事实支持了以下假设:这两种非联合性学习形式可能至少部分具有不同的潜在机制。