Hawkins R D, Cohen T E, Greene W, Kandel E R
Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Behav Neurosci. 1998 Feb;112(1):24-38. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.112.1.24.
Previous studies have raised questions about the relationships between habituation, dishabituation, sensitization, and inhibition of reflex responses. To explore this issue further, a systematic study of these simple forms of learning was carried out in unrestrained Aplysia in which the amplitude as well as the duration of both the gill- and siphon-withdrawal reflexes were measured after either tailshock or mantle shock. The results suggest that transient reflex inhibition is not an invariant effect of noxious stimulation but depends instead on the response measure, test time, and type of noxious stimulus. Furthermore, the results suggest that dishabituation and sensitization may not involve different processes at the behavioral level; rather the observed differences between them may be due largely to an interaction between habituation and inhibition.
以往的研究对习惯化、去习惯化、敏感化以及反射反应抑制之间的关系提出了疑问。为了进一步探讨这个问题,我们对未受束缚的海兔进行了这些简单学习形式的系统研究,在施加尾部电击或外套膜电击后,测量鳃和虹吸管收缩反射的幅度以及持续时间。结果表明,短暂的反射抑制并非有害刺激的不变效应,而是取决于反应指标、测试时间以及有害刺激的类型。此外,结果表明,去习惯化和敏感化在行为层面可能并不涉及不同的过程;相反,它们之间观察到的差异可能很大程度上归因于习惯化和抑制之间的相互作用。