Bruckmeier Karl, Ellegård Anders, Píriz Laura
Gothenburg University, Human Ecology Section, Sweden.
Ambio. 2005 Mar;34(2):101-10.
The participation of fishermen in fisheries management is discussed with varying ideas under the notions of "co-management", "participatory management" or "local management". Empirical studies within Swedish fishery have thrown new light on the preconditions for fishermen's participation in fisheries management. Among the important factors influencing failure or success are the two which we discuss here: the question of articulation, organization and representation of interests of fishermen and the question of trust between the groups that are usually cooperating in resource management, fishermen, governmental administrators and researchers. The research summarized has addressed the interests of fishermen with regard to resource management, local fisheries management, and participation of fishermen. The overarching question connecting the three themes is: How can the interests of fishermen be represented better within fisheries management? Interests and trust, "soft facts", can be as important for the success or failure of fisheries management and participation as can "hard facts" such as ownership rights, quantity and quality of resources or monetary value of resources.
在“共同管理”“参与式管理”或“地方管理”等概念下,人们对渔民参与渔业管理有着不同的看法。瑞典渔业的实证研究为渔民参与渔业管理的前提条件带来了新的认识。影响成败的重要因素中有两个是我们在此讨论的:渔民利益的表达、组织和代表问题,以及通常在资源管理中合作的群体——渔民、政府管理人员和研究人员之间的信任问题。所总结的研究涉及渔民在资源管理、地方渔业管理以及渔民参与方面的利益。连接这三个主题的首要问题是:如何在渔业管理中更好地代表渔民的利益?利益和信任这些“软事实”对于渔业管理和参与的成败可能与诸如所有权、资源的数量和质量或资源的货币价值等“硬事实”同样重要。