Cook R B, Collins D, Tucker J, Zioupos P
Department of Materials and Medical Sciences, Cranfield University Postgraduate Medical School, Shrivenham SN6 8LA, UK.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005 May;31(5):625-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.02.003.
This study aims to assess the sensitivity and specificity of two commercially available quantitative ultrasound (QUS) scanners (CUBA Clinical, Sunlight Omnisense), to differentiate patients with osteoporosis (OP) or osteopenia at the spine and hip confirmed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to investigate the optimum cut-off values to maximize the effectiveness of the screening technique. Participants (n = 268) received DXA scans on their lumbar spine (L1-L4) and hip, with paired QUS scans on their distal radius, proximal phalanx, midshaft tibia and calcaneus. Scanners were evaluated by using receiver-operating characteristics curves and their area under the curve (AUC) values. Measurement of the calcaneus by the CUBA Clinical showed a superior ability to predict DXA, with AUC values between 0.75 to 0.83 in comparison with AUC values of 0.60 to 0.70 for the Sunlight Omnisense. Cut-off values varied according to the technique used and the accuracy of the screening required. Assessment of the calcaneus was the best QUS technique for the prediction of low bone density at the axial skeleton as diagnosed by DXA.
本研究旨在评估两款市售定量超声(QUS)扫描仪(CUBA Clinical、Sunlight Omnisense)的敏感性和特异性,以鉴别经双能X线吸收法(DXA)确诊的脊柱和髋部骨质疏松症(OP)或骨质减少患者,并研究最佳截断值,以最大化筛查技术的有效性。参与者(n = 268)接受了腰椎(L1-L4)和髋部的DXA扫描,以及桡骨远端、近端指骨、胫骨干中段和跟骨的配对QUS扫描。通过使用受试者工作特征曲线及其曲线下面积(AUC)值对扫描仪进行评估。CUBA Clinical对跟骨的测量显示出预测DXA的卓越能力,AUC值在0.75至0.83之间,而Sunlight Omnisense的AUC值为0.60至0.70。截断值根据所使用的技术和所需筛查的准确性而有所不同。对跟骨的评估是预测经DXA诊断的轴向骨骼低骨密度的最佳QUS技术。