Moureau-Zabotto L, Bouchet C, Cesari D, Uzan S, Lefranc J-P, Antoine M, Genestie C, Deniaud-Alexandre E, Bernaudin J-F, Touboul E, Fleury-Feith J
Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Université Paris, France.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 May;91(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s10549-004-7047-1.
To assess the significance of S-phase fraction (SPF) and DNA ploidy evaluated by DNA flow cytometry as prognostic markers in stage I or II breast cancer.
A series of 271 patients, treated by surgery, radiotherapy +/- systemic therapy was analyzed (median follow up: 64 months). Standardized flow cytometry cell preparation from frozen samples and consensus rules for data interpretation were followed. Three SPF classes were defined on the basis of tertiles after adjustment for ploidy. Four groups were defined based on combinations of DNA ploidy (DIP: diploid; ANEUP: aneuploid) and SPF: DIP and low SPF (DL, n=37), DIP and medium or high SPF (DMH, n=76), ANEUP and low SPF (AL, n=24), ANEUP and medium or high SPF (AMH, n=68). Local control rate (LCR), disease-free survival (DFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) were correlated with DNA ploidy, SPF, DL to AMH groups, T and N stages, SBR grading, age, and hormonal status on univariate and multivariate analysis (Cox model).
On univariate analysis, DFS and LCR were higher for DIP tumours. High SPF values were associated with shorter DFS. LCR, MFS, DFS, and OS rates were significantly different with an increasingly poorer prognosis from DL to AMH. On multivariate analysis, groups DL to AMH, histological node involvement and T stage were independently associated with MFS, and DFS. In N- patients, DL to AMH remained independent for MFS and DFS. For SBR III tumours, MFS and OS were significantly different in DL to AMH groups. These results strongly support the use of combined evaluation of DNA ploidy and SPF as independent parameters in clinical trials for N- stage I and II breast cancer.
评估通过DNA流式细胞术评估的S期分数(SPF)和DNA倍性作为Ⅰ期或Ⅱ期乳腺癌预后标志物的意义。
分析了271例接受手术、放疗+/-全身治疗的患者(中位随访时间:64个月)。遵循了从冷冻样本中进行标准化流式细胞术细胞制备以及数据解释的共识规则。在对倍性进行调整后,根据三分位数定义了三个SPF类别。根据DNA倍性(DIP:二倍体;ANEUP:非整倍体)和SPF的组合定义了四组:DIP和低SPF(DL,n = 37)、DIP和中或高SPF(DMH,n = 76)、ANEUP和低SPF(AL,n = 24)、ANEUP和中或高SPF(AMH,n = 68)。在单因素和多因素分析(Cox模型)中,将局部控制率(LCR)、无病生存期(DFS)、无转移生存期(MFS)和总生存期(OS)与DNA倍性、SPF、DL至AMH组、T和N分期、SBR分级、年龄以及激素状态相关联。
在单因素分析中,DIP肿瘤的DFS和LCR较高。高SPF值与较短的DFS相关。从DL到AMH,LCR、MFS、DFS和OS率存在显著差异,预后越来越差。在多因素分析中,DL至AMH组、组织学淋巴结受累情况和T分期与MFS和DFS独立相关。在N-患者中,DL至AMH对于MFS和DFS仍具有独立性。对于SBR III期肿瘤,DL至AMH组的MFS和OS存在显著差异。这些结果有力地支持了在Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期N-乳腺癌的临床试验中,将DNA倍性和SPF的联合评估作为独立参数使用。