Lehtola Markku J, Miettinen Ilkka T, Lampola Tiia, Hirvonen Arja, Vartiainen Terttu, Martikainen Pertti J
Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Department of Environmental Health, National Public Health Institute, P.O. Box 95, FIN-70701, Kuopio, Finland.
Water Res. 2005 May;39(10):1962-71. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.03.009.
We studied how pipe material can modify the effectiveness of UV- and chlorine disinfection in drinking water and biofilms. This study was done with two pipe materials: copper and composite plastic (polyethylene, PE) in a pilot scale water distribution network. UV-disinfection decreased viable bacterial numbers in the pilot waterworks and outlet water of pipes on average by 79%, but in biofilms its disinfecting effect was minor. Chlorine decreased effectively the microbial numbers in water and biofilms of PE pipes. In outlet water from copper pipes, the effect of chlorination was weaker; microbial numbers increased back to the level before chlorination within a few days. In the biofilms present in the copper pipes, chlorine decreased microbial numbers only in front of the pipeline. One reason for weaker efficiency of chlorine in copper pipes was that its concentration declined more rapidly in the copper pipes than in the PE pipes. These results means that copper pipes may require a higher chlorine dosage than plastic pipes to achieve effective disinfection of the pipes.
我们研究了管材如何影响饮用水和生物膜中紫外线及氯消毒的效果。本研究采用了两种管材:铜和复合塑料(聚乙烯,PE),实验在中试规模的配水管网中进行。紫外线消毒使中试水厂和管道出水口的活菌数量平均减少了79%,但对生物膜的消毒效果较小。氯能有效降低PE管水中和生物膜中的微生物数量。在铜管的出水口,氯化作用的效果较弱;微生物数量在几天内回升至氯化前的水平。在铜管中的生物膜里,氯仅在管道前端降低了微生物数量。铜管中氯效率较低的一个原因是,其浓度在铜管中比在PE管中下降得更快。这些结果表明,为实现对管道的有效消毒,铜管可能比塑料管需要更高的氯剂量。