Suppr超能文献

在ALTS试验期间,使用数字化阴道镜图像进行阴道镜质量控制的观察者间一致性。

Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial.

作者信息

Ferris Daron G, Litaker Mark

机构信息

Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Center, Department of Family Medicine, The Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.

出版信息

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005 Jan;9(1):29-35. doi: 10.1097/00128360-200501000-00007.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate interobserver agreement among colposcopy quality control reviewers viewing digitized cervical images during the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three colposcopy quality control reviewers independently examined modem-transferred digitized colposcopic images from subjects examined at four clinical centers. Reviewers indicated colposcopic impression, Reid colposcopic index scores, lesion size, and the technical quality of the image. Rates of agreement were evaluated using the kappa statistic and McNemar and Bowker tests of symmetry.

RESULTS

Regarding colposcopic impressions, the average weighted kappa for pairs of initial reviewers was 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.39). kappa scores with respect to Reid colposcopic index, cervical image quality, and lesion size ranged from 0.23 to 0.28, 0.18 to 0.27, and 0.33 to 0.42, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Fair rates of agreement and poor to fair kappa scores among ALTS colposcopy quality control reviewers were noted for colposcopic impression, Reid colposcopic index scores, image quality, and lesion size. Great latitude exists in the interpretation of digitized cervical images. Poor image quality partially may explain these suboptimal results.

摘要

目的

在意义不明确的非典型鳞状细胞/低级别鳞状上皮内病变分流研究(ALTS)期间,评估阴道镜质量控制审查员在查看数字化宫颈图像时的观察者间一致性。

材料与方法

三名阴道镜质量控制审查员独立检查了来自四个临床中心接受检查的受试者经调制解调器传输的数字化阴道镜图像。审查员指出阴道镜印象、Reid阴道镜指数评分、病变大小和图像的技术质量。使用kappa统计量以及McNemar和Bowker对称性检验来评估一致性率。

结果

关于阴道镜印象,最初审查员对之间的平均加权kappa为0.36(95%置信区间,0.33 - 0.39)。Reid阴道镜指数、宫颈图像质量和病变大小的kappa评分分别为0.23至0.28、0.18至0.27和0.33至0.42。

结论

在ALTS阴道镜质量控制审查员中,对于阴道镜印象、Reid阴道镜指数评分、图像质量和病变大小,观察到一致性率一般,kappa评分从差到一般。在数字化宫颈图像的解读方面存在很大差异。图像质量差可能部分解释了这些不太理想的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验