Ferris Daron G, Litaker Mark
Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Center, Department of Family Medicine, The Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005 Jan;9(1):29-35. doi: 10.1097/00128360-200501000-00007.
To estimate interobserver agreement among colposcopy quality control reviewers viewing digitized cervical images during the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS).
Three colposcopy quality control reviewers independently examined modem-transferred digitized colposcopic images from subjects examined at four clinical centers. Reviewers indicated colposcopic impression, Reid colposcopic index scores, lesion size, and the technical quality of the image. Rates of agreement were evaluated using the kappa statistic and McNemar and Bowker tests of symmetry.
Regarding colposcopic impressions, the average weighted kappa for pairs of initial reviewers was 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.39). kappa scores with respect to Reid colposcopic index, cervical image quality, and lesion size ranged from 0.23 to 0.28, 0.18 to 0.27, and 0.33 to 0.42, respectively.
Fair rates of agreement and poor to fair kappa scores among ALTS colposcopy quality control reviewers were noted for colposcopic impression, Reid colposcopic index scores, image quality, and lesion size. Great latitude exists in the interpretation of digitized cervical images. Poor image quality partially may explain these suboptimal results.
在意义不明确的非典型鳞状细胞/低级别鳞状上皮内病变分流研究(ALTS)期间,评估阴道镜质量控制审查员在查看数字化宫颈图像时的观察者间一致性。
三名阴道镜质量控制审查员独立检查了来自四个临床中心接受检查的受试者经调制解调器传输的数字化阴道镜图像。审查员指出阴道镜印象、Reid阴道镜指数评分、病变大小和图像的技术质量。使用kappa统计量以及McNemar和Bowker对称性检验来评估一致性率。
关于阴道镜印象,最初审查员对之间的平均加权kappa为0.36(95%置信区间,0.33 - 0.39)。Reid阴道镜指数、宫颈图像质量和病变大小的kappa评分分别为0.23至0.28、0.18至0.27和0.33至0.42。
在ALTS阴道镜质量控制审查员中,对于阴道镜印象、Reid阴道镜指数评分、图像质量和病变大小,观察到一致性率一般,kappa评分从差到一般。在数字化宫颈图像的解读方面存在很大差异。图像质量差可能部分解释了这些不太理想的结果。