Van Coevering Pamela, Harnack Lisa, Schmitz Kathryn, Fulton Janet E, Galuska Deborah A, Gao Shujun
Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454-1015, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 May;37(5):867-71. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000162694.66799.fe.
Accelerometers may provide valid measures of physical activity, but the feasibility of using accelerometers with large groups of children is unknown. We assessed feasibility in the Eating and Activity Survey Trial (Project EAST), a study designed to develop valid tools to assess eating and physical activity patterns among middle school children.
Two hundred eighty-two Project EAST participants in grades 6-8 wore an accelerometer (Manufacturing Technologies, Inc., Fort Walton Beach, FL) for seven consecutive days. Multiple strategies were employed to encourage compliance and return of the accelerometer: 1) staff demonstrated how to wear the device properly; 2) students were given written and verbal instructions; 3) staff visited the students twice during 7 d to remind them to wear the devices and return them on time; and 4) movie tickets were given to students who returned the accelerometers on time.
Data from 27 accelerometers were lost as a result of mechanical and nontechnical problems, resulting in unusable data for 8.5% of students. Days of data for the remaining 255 students were considered incomplete if the accelerometer registered less than three consecutive waking hours of zero counts. The percentage of students with complete accelerometer data for 3-7 d of data were > or = 3 d, 92%; > or = 4 d, 86%; > or = 5 d, 75%; > or = 6 d, 67%; and 7 d, 50%. Twenty-eight students (10%) returned their accelerometers late. Overweight children were significantly more likely to have 7 d of complete data than nonoverweight children.
Our findings suggest that accelerometers are acceptable to most students. However, researchers working with middle school students should carefully monitor compliance to ensure that devices are worn properly and regularly.
加速度计可能提供有效的身体活动测量指标,但在大量儿童群体中使用加速度计的可行性尚不清楚。我们在饮食与活动调查试验(EAST项目)中评估了可行性,该研究旨在开发有效的工具来评估中学生的饮食和身体活动模式。
282名6至8年级的EAST项目参与者连续七天佩戴加速度计(佛罗里达州沃尔顿堡海滩的制造技术公司)。采用了多种策略来鼓励参与者遵守规定并归还加速度计:1)工作人员演示如何正确佩戴设备;2)向学生提供书面和口头说明;3)工作人员在7天内两次探访学生,提醒他们佩戴设备并按时归还;4)向按时归还加速度计的学生发放电影票。
由于机械和非技术问题,27个加速度计的数据丢失,导致8.5%的学生数据无法使用。如果加速度计记录的连续清醒时间少于三个小时且计数值为零,则其余255名学生的数据天数被视为不完整。加速度计数据完整3至7天的学生百分比分别为:≥3天,92%;≥4天,86%;≥5天,75%;≥6天,67%;7天,50%。28名学生(10%)延迟归还加速度计。超重儿童比非超重儿童更有可能拥有完整的7天数据。
我们的研究结果表明加速度计为大多数学生所接受。然而,与中学生合作的研究人员应仔细监测遵守情况,以确保设备正确且定期佩戴。