Shiyko Mariya P, Perkins Seth, Caldwell Linda
Department of Applied Psychology, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University.
Department of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Management, Pennsylvania State University.
Psychol Assess. 2017 Jul;29(7):926-934. doi: 10.1037/pas0000386. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
All adolescents in general, including ethnic and racial minorities, report high levels of cell phone use, making mobile technology a useful tool for assessment and intervention. Known health and education disparities based on minority status motivated us to conduct an in-depth investigation regarding feasibility of and adherence to the ecological momentary assessment (EMA) research protocol, studying daily life of urban minority youth. In addition, this paper presents a methodological approach to conceptualizing and reporting adherence in EMA studies. The sample was comprised of 126 youth (41.3% boys; 40.5% 7th and 59.5% 8th graders; 75.4% African American, and 20.6% Hispanic) who carried a mobile phone for 10 days, including 2 weekends and reported on activities, moods, and attitudes. Mean level of adherence was 81% for momentary and 93.8% for daily assessments; it decreased over time and was higher during the week compared to weekends. Adherence was lower on days when participants reported high levels of negative affect and on days when they were engaged in physical activities. Our findings underscore the importance of differentiating between human and technology-related factors when computing adherence rates and portray adherence as a complex and dynamic construct that can vary across individuals. Specific study recommendations and methodological discussion provide guidelines for designing future studies. (PsycINFO Database Record
一般来说,所有青少年,包括少数族裔和种族少数群体,都报告了较高的手机使用率,这使得移动技术成为评估和干预的有用工具。基于少数群体身份的已知健康和教育差异促使我们对城市少数族裔青少年日常生活中的生态瞬时评估(EMA)研究方案的可行性和依从性进行深入调查。此外,本文还提出了一种在EMA研究中概念化和报告依从性的方法。样本包括126名青少年(41.3%为男孩;40.5%为七年级学生,59.5%为八年级学生;75.4%为非裔美国人,20.6%为西班牙裔),他们携带手机10天,包括2个周末,并报告活动、情绪和态度。瞬时评估的平均依从率为81%,每日评估的平均依从率为93.8%;依从率随时间下降,与周末相比,工作日的依从率更高。参与者报告高负面情绪的日子和进行体育活动的日子,依从率较低。我们的研究结果强调了在计算依从率时区分人为因素和技术相关因素的重要性,并将依从性描述为一个复杂且动态的结构,个体之间可能存在差异。具体的研究建议和方法学讨论为设计未来研究提供了指导方针。(PsycINFO数据库记录)