Weston Christine M, O'Brien Linda A, Goldfarb Neil I, Roumm Adam R, Isele William P, Hirschfeld Kathryn
Department of Health Policy, Thomas Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005 Jan-Feb;6(1):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2004.12.004.
This article reports the results of an evaluation of the New Jersey Stein Ethics Education and Development (NJ SEED) project--a statewide initiative to create, organize and educate a statewide network of regional long-term care ethics committees. The main focus of the evaluation was to measure utilization of the committees, describe how facilities have benefited from the project, and identify potential barriers to the use of this resource.
Based on administrative records from the NJ SEED project, 225 facilities were identified and asked to complete a facility survey. Ninety-three surveys were received, resulting in a 41% response rate. An additional survey of the regional ethics committees (RECs), as well as several focus groups and individual interviews were conducted to supplement the survey data.
Fifty-eight percent of the facility respondents reported current participation in an NJ regional ethics committee. About one third (30%) of participating facilities had requested a formal case consultation (on at least one occasion) on behalf of a resident, but two thirds had consulted with their RECs on a more informal basis. Facilities that reported participating in the REC Network were more likely to have formally written policies than nonparticipants.
Many NJ nursing homes find the statewide REC Network to be an important resource; however continued efforts need to be expended for recruiting and training facilities that are not taking full advantage of this important source of peer support and professional expertise.
本文报告了新泽西州斯坦伦理教育与发展(NJ SEED)项目的评估结果——这是一项全州范围的倡议,旨在创建、组织并教育一个全州范围的区域长期护理伦理委员会网络。评估的主要重点是衡量委员会的利用率,描述各机构如何从该项目中受益,并确定使用这一资源的潜在障碍。
根据NJ SEED项目的行政记录,确定了225家机构,并要求它们完成一份机构调查问卷。共收到93份调查问卷,回复率为41%。还对区域伦理委员会(REC)进行了额外调查,并开展了几个焦点小组讨论和个人访谈,以补充调查数据。
58%的机构受访者表示目前参与了新泽西州的区域伦理委员会。约三分之一(30%)的参与机构曾(至少一次)代表居民请求进行正式的案例咨询,但三分之二的机构与它们的区域伦理委员会进行过更非正式的咨询。报告参与区域伦理委员会网络的机构比未参与者更有可能拥有正式书面政策。
许多新泽西州的养老院发现全州范围的区域伦理委员会网络是一项重要资源;然而,对于那些没有充分利用这一重要的同行支持和专业知识来源的机构,仍需继续努力进行招募和培训。