• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高痴呆症护理人员的道德自我效能:护理计划的混合方法可行性研究。

Enhancing ethical self-efficacy among dementia caregiver staff: A mixed-methods feasibility study of the care programme.

作者信息

Lauridsen Sigurd, Skov Sofie Smedegaard, Thorup Lucca-Mathilde, Berg Marie-Eva, Folker Anna Paldam, Simonsen Peter, Schou-Juul Frederik

机构信息

The National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department for the Study of Culture, University of Southern Denmark, University of Southern Denmark Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jan 15;8:100294. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100294. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100294
PMID:39896919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11787412/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The global population living with dementia is rapidly increasing, with projections estimated at 78 million by 2030 and 132 million by 2050 due to ageing demographics. Despite the increasing prevalence of dementia, effective treatments remain limited. High-quality care is critical, but it presents complex ethical challenges, including balancing autonomy with best interests, addressing the needs of individuals with dementia and their caregivers, and equitably allocating resources. To address these challenges, we introduced the CARE programme, a systematic approach to ethics work, in nursing homes to enhance the ethical self-efficacy of nursing home staff.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the feasibility of the CARE programme in a community-based Danish nursing home setting. Using the framework of Bowen et al. and a mixed-methods research design, we conducted six face-to-face focus group interviews with nursing home staff, two telephone interviews with nursing home managers, and a survey among 90 participants. Data were collected in the spring and fall of 2022.

METHOD

Quantitative data were analysed using STATA for descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were processed using a six-step template analysis framework.

RESULTS

The results indicate high feasibility and acceptance of the CARE programme among the nursing home staff. To a high/some degree, 97 % expressed satisfaction, 95 % found the programme relevant to their work, 90 % believed it would improve dementia care, and 82 % felt better equipped to handle ethical dilemmas. Both the management and staff acknowledged the programme's effectiveness in filling the critical gap in ethics training in nursing homes. Appreciation for external facilitation, participation from multiple nursing homes, and cross-institutional group work emphasised the value of the programme.

CONCLUSION

The quantitative results indicate high levels of satisfaction and relevance, with the majority of participants believing that the program improves care and enhances their ability to manage ethical issues. Qualitative insights further emphasize the program's success in meeting the need for ethics training, facilitated by external researchers and cross-institutional collaboration. Full implementation of the CARE programme requires a cultural shift in nursing homes that advocates for universal staff involvement in ethics training and promotes open dialogue about ethical issues. Moreover, policy changes may be necessary to secure funding and establish minimum training standards for nursing home staff.

摘要

背景

由于人口老龄化,全球痴呆症患者数量正在迅速增加,预计到2030年将达到7800万,到2050年将达到1.32亿。尽管痴呆症的患病率不断上升,但有效的治疗方法仍然有限。高质量的护理至关重要,但它带来了复杂的伦理挑战,包括在自主权与最大利益之间取得平衡、满足痴呆症患者及其护理人员的需求以及公平分配资源。为应对这些挑战,我们在养老院引入了CARE计划,这是一种系统的伦理工作方法,以提高养老院工作人员的伦理自我效能感。

目的

本研究评估了CARE计划在丹麦一家社区养老院环境中的可行性。我们采用鲍恩等人的框架和混合方法研究设计,对养老院工作人员进行了六次面对面焦点小组访谈,对养老院管理人员进行了两次电话访谈,并对90名参与者进行了一项调查。数据于2022年春季和秋季收集。

方法

定量数据使用STATA进行描述性统计分析,而定性数据使用六步模板分析框架进行处理。

结果

结果表明,CARE计划在养老院工作人员中具有很高的可行性和接受度。在很大程度上,97%的人表示满意,95%的人认为该计划与他们的工作相关,90%的人认为它将改善痴呆症护理,82%的人觉得自己处理伦理困境的能力有所提高。管理层和工作人员都承认该计划在填补养老院伦理培训关键空白方面的有效性。对外部协助、多个养老院的参与以及跨机构小组工作的赞赏强调了该计划的价值。

结论

定量结果表明满意度和相关性很高,大多数参与者认为该计划改善了护理并增强了他们处理伦理问题的能力。定性见解进一步强调了该计划在满足伦理培训需求方面的成功,这得益于外部研究人员和跨机构合作。全面实施CARE计划需要养老院进行文化转变,倡导全体工作人员参与伦理培训,并促进关于伦理问题的公开对话。此外,可能需要政策变革以确保资金并为养老院工作人员制定最低培训标准。

相似文献

1
Enhancing ethical self-efficacy among dementia caregiver staff: A mixed-methods feasibility study of the care programme.提高痴呆症护理人员的道德自我效能:护理计划的混合方法可行性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jan 15;8:100294. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100294. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.一项改善养老院中晚期痴呆症患者生活质量的团体干预措施:Namaste 可行性聚类 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan;24(6):1-140. doi: 10.3310/hta24060.
3
Relationship between staff and quality of care in care homes: StaRQ mixed methods study.养老院员工与护理质量的关系:StaRQ 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Apr;12(8):1-139. doi: 10.3310/GWTT8143.
4
Facilitation of an end-of-life care programme into practice within UK nursing care homes: A mixed-methods study.将终末期关怀方案融入英国护理养老院实践:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jun;82:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
5
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
6
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
7
Reducing unplanned hospital admissions from care homes: a systematic review.减少养老院的非计划性住院:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(18):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KLPW6338.
8
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Organising general practice for care homes: a multi-method study.为养老院组织全科医疗服务:一项多方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Apr;13(11):1-68. doi: 10.3310/YNDV6358.
10
Strategies for older people living in care homes to prevent urinary tract infection: the StOP UTI realist synthesis.养老院内老年人预防尿路感染的策略:StOP UTI 现实综合研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(68):1-139. doi: 10.3310/DADT3410.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical self-efficacy among healthcare professionals caring for people with dementia: a brief pre- and post-report on the CARE intervention.照顾痴呆症患者的医护人员的伦理自我效能感:CARE 干预的简短预报告和后报告。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 9;25(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01106-z.
2
Development and prima facie validation of the Dementia-Specific Ethical Self-Efficacy scale for professional caregivers.专业照护者的痴呆症特异性伦理自我效能感量表的编制与初步验证。
Dementia (London). 2024 Aug;23(6):1036-1051. doi: 10.1177/14713012241262833. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
3
'We had conversations we wouldn't have had otherwise'-Exploring home-dwelling people with dementia and family members' experiences of deliberating on ethical issues in a literature-based intervention.“我们进行了原本不会进行的对话”——探索在基于文献的干预中,居家痴呆症患者及其家属在伦理问题上的思考体验。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Jul;33(7):2719-2731. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17138. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
4
Reasons for resistance to change in nursing: an integrative review.护理领域中变革阻力的原因:一项综合综述
BMC Nurs. 2023 Sep 11;22(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01460-0.
5
Developing the CARE intervention to enhance ethical self-efficacy in dementia care through the use of literary texts.开发 CARE 干预措施,通过使用文学文本提高痴呆症护理中的伦理自我效能。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jun 29;24(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00926-9.
6
Effect of Self-Efficacy on Quality of Life in People With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia: The Mediating Roles of Depression and Anxiety.自我效能感对轻度认知障碍和轻度痴呆患者生活质量的影响:抑郁和焦虑的中介作用。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2020 Jan-Dec;35:1533317519885264. doi: 10.1177/1533317519885264.
7
Towards evidence-based palliative care in nursing homes in Sweden: a qualitative study informed by the organizational readiness to change theory.迈向瑞典养老院基于证据的姑息治疗:一项基于组织变革准备理论的定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 4;13(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0699-0.
8
A European multicenter study on systematic ethics work in nursing homes.一项关于养老院系统伦理工作的欧洲多中心研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Sep;31(3):587-601. doi: 10.1111/scs.12373. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
9
The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research.模板分析在定性心理学研究中的效用
Qual Res Psychol. 2015 Apr 3;12(2):202-222. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2014.955224. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
10
Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Results in Health Science Mixed Methods Research Through Joint Displays.通过联合展示在健康科学混合方法研究中整合定量和定性结果。
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Nov;13(6):554-61. doi: 10.1370/afm.1865.