Alexander Beth J, Plank Paula, Carlson Mary B, Hanson Peggy, Picken Kristi, Schwebke Kay
Augsburg College, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005 Mar-Apr;6(2):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2004.12.024.
Structured programs for routine pain assessment and treatment are necessary to optimize care for residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs). A pilot study was designed to develop, implement, and evaluate a system for pain assessment and monitoring in a LTCF. Additional goals were to determine whether a verbal and/or non-verbal tool adequately assess pain in residents of LTCFs and whether the pharmacologic therapy for pain changes with the implementation of a pain assessment and monitoring system.
Quantitative, nonexperimental design using two pain assessment tools.
The study was conducted at a LTCF in a rural midwestern setting.
The study population for phase I included residents on any pain medication (regularly scheduled or as needed) on the secure dementia unit. The target population for phase II consisted of residents on any pain medication on an open unit.
Training was provided to the nursing staff on how to use two pain assessment tools, one verbal (colored visual analog scale) and one nonverbal (observed pain target behaviors), and documentation. In addition, a continuing education program on pain assessment and management in elderly residents and barriers to pain management in LTCFs was offered to medical providers.
Evaluation with the colored visual analog scale (CVAS) occurred twice daily. Pain target behaviors were monitored throughout the day and recorded by nursing staff at the end of each shift. All residents in the study population were monitored daily for six months.
Most of the residents on both units were unable to use the verbal tool; however, the nonverbal tool was used successfully for all residents studied. On the dementia unit, the use of pain medications increased, and pain target behaviors decreased during the study period; on the open unit, the use of pain medications remained stable, and pain target behaviors decreased.
These data suggest that an increase in awareness of pain may facilitate an improvement in the assessment and management of pain in residents of LTCFs. The feasibility of the nonverbal pain monitoring method shown in this study has positive implications on quality of care issues if generalizable to a larger population.
制定常规疼痛评估与治疗的结构化方案对于优化长期护理机构(LTCF)居民的护理至关重要。一项试点研究旨在开发、实施和评估一个LTCF中的疼痛评估与监测系统。其他目标包括确定一种言语和/或非言语工具是否能充分评估LTCF居民的疼痛,以及随着疼痛评估与监测系统的实施,疼痛的药物治疗是否会发生变化。
使用两种疼痛评估工具的定量非实验性设计。
该研究在中西部农村地区的一个LTCF进行。
第一阶段的研究人群包括安全痴呆症病房中正在服用任何止痛药物(定期或按需服用)的居民。第二阶段的目标人群包括开放病房中正在服用任何止痛药物的居民。
对护理人员进行培训,内容是如何使用两种疼痛评估工具,一种是言语工具(彩色视觉模拟量表),一种是非言语工具(观察到的疼痛目标行为),以及记录方法。此外,还为医疗服务提供者提供了关于老年居民疼痛评估与管理以及LTCF中疼痛管理障碍的继续教育项目。
每天使用彩色视觉模拟量表(CVAS)进行两次评估。全天监测疼痛目标行为,并由护理人员在每个班次结束时记录。对研究人群中的所有居民进行为期六个月的每日监测。
两个病房中的大多数居民都无法使用言语工具;然而,非言语工具成功用于所有研究对象。在痴呆症病房,研究期间止痛药物的使用增加,疼痛目标行为减少;在开放病房,止痛药物的使用保持稳定,疼痛目标行为减少。
这些数据表明,疼痛意识的提高可能有助于改善LTCF居民疼痛的评估与管理。本研究中所示的非言语疼痛监测方法的可行性,如果能推广到更多人群,对护理质量问题具有积极意义。