• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腕管松解术的掌中部精准切口

Midpalmar accurate incision for carpal tunnel release.

作者信息

Tzaan Wen-Ching, Lui Tai-Ngar, Lee Shih-Tseng

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan 204, ROC.

出版信息

Chang Gung Med J. 2005 Feb;28(2):97-103.

PMID:15880985
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common entrapment neuropathy in humans today. For patients in whom conservative treatment fails, surgical decompression is indicated. Among the various surgical techniques currently in use, endoscopic techniques are becoming increasingly popular. Due to the rapid postoperative recovery shown after endoscopic operations, midpalmar accurate incision for carpal tunnel release is a comparative alternative.

METHODS

From February 1998 through January 2003, 84 patients had undergone 96 midpalmar carpal tunnel releases with accurate skin incisions under regional block or general mask anesthesia. The postoperative evaluations were performed via subjective assessment with a standardized telephone interview over an average follow-up period of 22.4 months.

RESULTS

The average operation time was 16 minutes (range, 5 to 40 minutes). A total of 87 hands (91%) had excellent or good recovery in terms of symptom relief (improvement of 70% or greater). The incidence of postoperative sensory morbidity, i.e., pillar pain or scar tenderness, was 7% (7 hands). The motor functional morbidity of a persistent subjective decrease in grip strength was noted in 8% (8 hands), and the mean period for returning to work was 4.5 weeks. In addition, no operation-induced neurovascular or tendinous injury occurred in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes were similar to those of endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Based on these results, midpalmar carpal tunnel release with accurate location of skin incision is as effective as any other surgical procedures for carpal tunnel release. Furthermore, it is also a safe and simple procedure.

摘要

背景

腕管综合征是当今人类最常见的卡压性神经病变。对于保守治疗失败的患者,需进行手术减压。在目前使用的各种手术技术中,内镜技术越来越受欢迎。由于内镜手术后恢复迅速,掌中部精准切口腕管松解术是一种可供比较的选择。

方法

从1998年2月至2003年1月,84例患者在区域阻滞或全身面罩麻醉下接受了96次掌中部腕管精准皮肤切口松解术。术后评估通过标准化电话访谈进行主观评估,平均随访期为22.4个月。

结果

平均手术时间为16分钟(范围5至40分钟)。就症状缓解而言(改善70%或更高),共有87只手(91%)恢复良好或极佳。术后感觉并发症的发生率,即柱状疼痛或瘢痕压痛,为7%(7只手)。握力持续主观下降的运动功能并发症发生率为8%(8只手),平均重返工作岗位时间为4.5周。此外,没有患者发生手术引起的神经血管或肌腱损伤。

结论

结果与内镜腕管松解术相似。基于这些结果,掌中部腕管松解术且皮肤切口定位精准与其他任何腕管松解手术方法一样有效。此外,它也是一种安全且简单的手术。

相似文献

1
Midpalmar accurate incision for carpal tunnel release.腕管松解术的掌中部精准切口
Chang Gung Med J. 2005 Feb;28(2):97-103.
2
Minimally invasive carpal tunnel decompression using the KnifeLight.使用KnifeLight进行微创腕管减压术。
Neurosurgery. 2007 Feb;60(2 Suppl 1):ONS162-8; discussion ONS168-9. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249249.33052.7E.
3
Double incision open technique for carpal tunnel release: an alternative to endoscopic release.双切口开放技术治疗腕管综合征:内镜松解术的替代方法
J Hand Surg Am. 1994 Nov;19(6):907-12. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90088-4.
4
Patient-reported outcome after carpal tunnel release for advanced disease: a prospective and longitudinal assessment in patients older than age 70.晚期疾病腕管松解术后患者报告的结局:70岁以上患者的前瞻性纵向评估
J Hand Surg Am. 2004 May;29(3):379-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.02.003.
5
Endoscopic release in carpal tunnel syndrome: analysis of clinical results in 200 cases.腕管综合征的内镜下松解术:200例临床结果分析
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2003 Feb;46(1):11-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37966.
6
Endoscopic carpal tunnel release in a community-based series.基于社区的一系列内镜下腕管松解术
J Hand Surg Am. 1993 May;18(3):451-4. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90090-P.
7
The mini incision technique for carpal tunnel decompression using nasal instruments.使用鼻科器械进行腕管减压的小切口技术。
Turk Neurosurg. 2010 Jul;20(3):353-7. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.2526-09.0.
8
[Surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparison between long and short incision and endoscopic release].腕管综合征的手术治疗:长切口与短切口及内镜下松解的比较
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1996 May;28(3):160-6.
9
[Endoscopic carpal ligament release using the Chow technique: early clinical results].[采用Chow技术的内镜下腕管韧带松解术:早期临床结果]
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2003;37(3):226-32.
10
Double- versus single-incision technique for open carpal tunnel release.开放式腕管松解术的双切口与单切口技术
Orthopedics. 2009 Oct;32(10). doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090818-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Therapeutic Effect of the Mini-Open Incision and Conventional Open Neurolysis of the Median Nerve for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.微创切口与传统开放性正中神经松解术治疗腕管综合征的疗效比较。
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Oct 21;2022:4082618. doi: 10.1155/2022/4082618. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparing open conventional carpal tunnel release with mini-incision technique in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A non-randomized clinical trial.开放传统腕管松解术与小切口技术治疗腕管综合征的比较:一项非随机临床试验。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 May 16;55:119-123. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.05.001. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
Functional Outcomes of 300 Carpal Tunnel Release: 1.5 cm Longitudinal Mini-incision.
300例腕管松解术的功能结局:1.5厘米纵向小切口
Asian J Neurosurg. 2019 Jul-Sep;14(3):693-697. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_31_17.
4
A Retrospective Comparison of Conventional versus Transverse Mini-Incision Technique for Carpal Tunnel Release.传统与横向小切口技术治疗腕管综合征的回顾性比较
ISRN Neurol. 2013 Dec 12;2013:721830. doi: 10.1155/2013/721830. eCollection 2013.