Suppr超能文献

患者对磁性、杆卡式和球帽式下颌种植覆盖义齿的满意度及偏好:一项交叉临床试验。

Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.

作者信息

Cune Marco, van Kampen Frits, van der Bilt Andries, Bosman Frits

机构信息

Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2005 Mar-Apr;18(2):99-105.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to: (1) determine patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures using magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket attachments; and (2) assess the relation between maximum bite force and patient satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a cross-over clinical trial, 18 edentulous patients with mandibular denture complaints received two mandibular implants and new mandibular and maxillary dentures. The mandibular denture was initially without any kind of attachment system, but it was fitted with one of the attachment types after 3 months. The attachments were changed 3 months thereafter, in random order. A questionnaire on denture complaints was administered at baseline (with the old denture), after 3 months of function with the new denture without attachments, and after 3 months of function with each of the attachments (within-subject comparison). In addition, patients were asked to express their overall appreciation of their dentures on a VAS. Patients' preferences were determined at the end of the experiment. Maximum bite forces were obtained from a previous study with the same population. Five scales of denture complaints were constructed. Mean scale and VAS scores at the five evaluation points were compared among the groups. Pearson correlation was calculated between maximum bite force and scale and VAS scores.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Mandibular implant-supported overdenture treatment reduced various denture complaints. The VAS score better reflected patients' preferences than did scale score. Patients strongly preferred bar-clip (10/18 subjects) and ball-socket attachments (7/18 subjects) over magnet attachments (1/18 subjects). Patients' preferences could not be predicted on the basis of baseline observations. Maximum bite force was not correlated to scale or VAS score. Hence, patients with higher maximum bite forces were not necessarily more satisfied.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)确定患者对使用磁体、杆夹和球窝附着体的种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿的满意度;(2)评估最大咬合力与患者满意度之间的关系。

材料与方法

在一项交叉临床试验中,18名有下颌义齿问题的无牙颌患者接受了两颗下颌种植体以及新的下颌和上颌义齿。下颌义齿最初没有任何附着系统,但在3个月后安装了其中一种附着类型。此后3个月,附着体按随机顺序更换。在基线时(佩戴旧义齿)、佩戴无附着体的新义齿3个月后以及佩戴每种附着体3个月后(受试者内比较),发放一份关于义齿问题的问卷。此外,要求患者在视觉模拟量表(VAS)上表达对义齿的总体评价。在实验结束时确定患者的偏好。最大咬合力数据来自之前对同一人群的研究。构建了五个义齿问题量表。比较了各组在五个评估点的平均量表得分和VAS得分。计算了最大咬合力与量表得分和VAS得分之间的Pearson相关性。

结果与结论

下颌种植体支持的覆盖义齿治疗减少了各种义齿问题。与量表得分相比,VAS得分能更好地反映患者的偏好。与磁体附着体(1/18名受试者)相比,患者强烈更喜欢杆夹(10/18名受试者)和球窝附着体(7/18名受试者)。无法根据基线观察结果预测患者的偏好。最大咬合力与量表得分或VAS得分无关。因此,最大咬合力较高的患者不一定更满意。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验