Singh Kavipal, Singh Jashandeep, Suman Neelam, Kaur Ravneet, Chopra Priyanka
Department of Prosthodontics, SGRD Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2112-S2115. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_65_24. Epub 2024 May 13.
Mandibular dentures are considered dubious in terms of retention in resorbed ridges. Implant bearing overdentures can be a solution to the abovesaid issue. Various attachments in use offer variations in retention and maintenance. The aim was to assess long term durability and retention of implant supported overdenture attachments. Two implant bearing overdentures were placed in 20 patients. Magnet and ball attachment were used and dentures were evaluated over a period of three years at different time intervals. Difference of attachments' performance between intervals was assessed with ANOVA test and Tukey HSD post hoc test and the level of significance was set at p<0.05. There was a decline in retention throughout research period in both categories; the ball and socket batch showed statistically significant (P<0.05) better retention force compared to that of magnet group. There was lesser decline in mean retention force of 10.97N±0.82 to 7.24N±0.903 from one month to three years in magnet attachment retained overdentures. Ball attachments offer better retentive forces than magnet category. Magnet bearing overdentures offer more durability in terms of retention.
就保留在吸收性牙槽嵴中的情况而言,下颌义齿的固位被认为是不可靠的。种植体支持的覆盖义齿可以解决上述问题。目前使用的各种附着体在固位和维持方面存在差异。本研究旨在评估种植体支持的覆盖义齿附着体的长期耐用性和固位情况。在20例患者口中植入了两枚种植体支持的覆盖义齿。使用了磁体和球帽附着体,并在三年的时间里于不同时间间隔对义齿进行评估。采用方差分析(ANOVA)检验和Tukey HSD事后检验评估不同时间间隔附着体性能的差异,显著性水平设定为p<0.05。在整个研究期间,两类附着体的固位力均有所下降;与磁体组相比,球帽组的固位力在统计学上具有显著差异(P<0.05),表现更好。在磁体附着体支持的覆盖义齿中,平均固位力从一个月时的10.97N±0.82下降到三年时的7.24N±0.903,下降幅度较小。球帽附着体提供的固位力比磁体类更好。磁体支持的覆盖义齿在固位方面具有更高的耐用性。