Hoverman Jason T, Auld Josh R, Relyea Rick A
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Oecologia. 2005 Jul;144(3):481-91. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0082-8. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
The last decade has seen an explosion in the number of studies exploring predator-induced plasticity. Recently, there has been a call for more comprehensive approaches that can identify functional relationships between traits, constraints on phenotypic responses, and the cost and benefits of alternative phenotypes. In this study, we exposed Helisoma trivolvis, a freshwater snail, to a factorial combination of three resource levels and five predator environments (no predator, one or two water bugs, and one or two crayfish) and examined ten traits including behavior, morphology, and life history. Each predator induced a unique suite of behavioral and morphological responses. Snails increased near-surface habitat use with crayfish but not with water bugs. Further, crayfish induced narrow and high shells whereas water bugs induced wide shells and wide apertures. In terms of life history, both predators induced delayed reproduction and greater mass at reproduction. However, crayfish induced a greater delay in reproduction that resulted in reduced fecundity whereas water bugs did not induce differences in fecundity. Resource levels impacted the morphology of H. trivolvis; snails reared with greater resource levels produced higher shells, narrower shells, and wider apertures. Resource levels also impacted snail life history; lower resources caused longer times to reproduction and reduced fecundity. Based on an analysis of phenotypic correlations, the morphological responses to each predator most likely represent phenotypic trade-offs. Snails could either produce invasion-resistant shells for defense against water bugs or crush-resistant shells for defense against crayfish, but not both. Our use of a comprehensive approach to examine the responses of H. trivolvis has provided important information regarding the complexity of phenotypic responses to different environments, the patterns of phenotypic integration across environments, and the potential costs and benefits associated with plastic traits.
在过去十年中,探索捕食者诱导可塑性的研究数量呈爆发式增长。最近,人们呼吁采用更全面的方法,以确定性状之间的功能关系、表型反应的限制因素以及替代表型的成本和收益。在本研究中,我们将淡水螺——三带扁卷螺暴露于三种资源水平和五种捕食者环境(无捕食者、一或两只田鳖、一或两只小龙虾)的析因组合中,并研究了包括行为、形态和生活史在内的十个性状。每种捕食者都诱导出一套独特的行为和形态反应。小龙虾会使蜗牛增加对近水面栖息地的利用,而田鳖则不会。此外,小龙虾诱导出窄而高的壳,而田鳖诱导出宽壳和宽开口。在生活史上,两种捕食者都诱导出繁殖延迟和繁殖时更大的体重。然而,小龙虾诱导的繁殖延迟更大,导致繁殖力降低,而田鳖并未诱导繁殖力出现差异。资源水平影响了三带扁卷螺的形态;在资源水平较高的环境中饲养的蜗牛产生更高、更窄的壳和更宽的开口。资源水平也影响了蜗牛的生活史;资源较少会导致繁殖时间延长和繁殖力降低。基于对表型相关性的分析,对每种捕食者的形态反应很可能代表了表型权衡。蜗牛要么产生抗入侵的壳来防御田鳖,要么产生抗挤压的壳来防御小龙虾,但不能两者兼具。我们采用全面的方法来研究三带扁卷螺的反应,为不同环境下表型反应的复杂性、跨环境的表型整合模式以及与可塑性性状相关的潜在成本和收益提供了重要信息。