Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721.
Zoology Department, Stockholm University, Stockholm, 11419, Sweden.
Evolution. 2022 May;76(5):858-869. doi: 10.1111/evo.14464. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
Organisms can often respond adaptively to a change in their environment through phenotypic plasticity in multiple traits, a phenomenon termed as multivariate plasticity. These different plastic responses could interact and affect each other's development as well as selection on each other, but the causes and consequences of these interactions have received relatively little attention. Here, we propose a new conceptual framework for understanding how different plastic responses can affect each other's development and why organisms should have multiple plastic responses. A plastic change in one trait could alter the phenotype of a second plastic trait by changing either the cue received by the organism (cue-mediated effect) or the response to that cue (response-mediated effect). Multivariate plasticity could benefit the organism either because the plastic responses work better when expressed together (synergy) or because each response is more effective under different environmental circumstances (complementarity). We illustrate these hypotheses with case studies, focusing on interactions between behavior and morphology, plastic traits that differ in their reversibility. Future empirical and theoretical research should investigate the consequences of these interactions for additional factors important for the evolution of plasticity, such as the limits and costs of plasticity.
生物通常可以通过多个特征的表型可塑性来适应环境变化,这种现象被称为多元可塑性。这些不同的可塑性反应可能相互作用,并影响彼此的发育和选择,但这些相互作用的原因和后果相对较少受到关注。在这里,我们提出了一个新的概念框架,以理解不同的可塑性反应如何相互影响,以及为什么生物体应该具有多种可塑性反应。一个特征的可塑性变化可以通过改变生物接收到的线索(线索介导的效应)或对该线索的反应(反应介导的效应)来改变第二个可塑性特征的表型。多元可塑性对生物体有益,要么是因为这些可塑性反应一起表达时效果更好(协同作用),要么是因为每个反应在不同的环境条件下更有效(互补性)。我们通过案例研究来说明这些假设,重点是行为和形态之间的相互作用,以及可塑性特征在可逆性上的差异。未来的实证和理论研究应该调查这些相互作用对其他对可塑性进化重要的因素的后果,例如可塑性的限制和成本。