Cicero Theodore J, Inciardi James A, Adams Edgar H, Geller Anne, Senay Edward C, Woody George E, Muñoz Alvaro
Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Dec;14(12):851-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.1113.
The analgesic Tramadol HCl (Ultram) was approved in 1994 as a non-scheduled drug under the CSA provided that a novel risk-management program would be developed by an Independent Steering Committee (ISC). The risk-management program began in 1995 with the launch of Ultram, and has been modified over the past decade to accommodate Ultracet (Ultram and acetaminophen) in 2001 and generic tramadol in 2002. This provided a unique opportunity to study the potential changes in abuse as the generic and combination products became available.
To proactively detect cases of abuse and diversion, the ISC developed a comprehensive questionnaire which was completed quarterly by an extensive network of drug abuse experts (n = 309) and police agencies (n = 100) who were asked to indicate how many diversion cases involving Ultram, Ultracet, and generic tramadol were identified during the preceding 3 months and what were the ten most commonly diverted drugs in their catchment area during that period.
The data generated demonstrate that the abuse of tramadol remained very low despite new branded and generic formulations. Contrary to the hypothesis that cheaper generic drugs would lead to higher rates of abuse, we found no increase in abuse with the introduction of generic tramadol. Ultracet abuse rates, unlike those found with other widely used hydrocodone and oxycodone combination products, have been even lower than that observed for tramadol. Since the FDA has now mandated that proactive risk-management plans be implemented for new drugs, the tramadol risk-management plan may be useful as a prototypic model which can be modified to accommodate other drugs with abuse potential.
盐酸曲马多(奥施康定)于1994年被批准为《管制物质法》规定的非管制药物,条件是由独立指导委员会(ISC)制定一项新的风险管理计划。风险管理计划于1995年随着奥施康定的推出而启动,并在过去十年中进行了修改,以纳入2001年的复方曲马多(奥施康定与对乙酰氨基酚)和2002年的曲马多仿制药。这提供了一个独特的机会来研究随着仿制药和复方产品上市,滥用情况可能发生的变化。
为了主动发现滥用和转移的案例,ISC制定了一份综合问卷,由广泛的药物滥用专家网络(n = 309)和警察机构(n = 100)每季度填写,要求他们指出在前三个月中发现了多少起涉及曲马多、复方曲马多和曲马多仿制药的转移案例,以及在此期间其管辖区域内最常被转移的十种药物是什么。
所产生的数据表明,尽管有新的品牌药和仿制药配方,曲马多的滥用率仍然很低。与便宜的仿制药会导致更高滥用率的假设相反,我们发现引入曲马多仿制药后滥用情况并未增加。复方曲马多的滥用率与其他广泛使用的氢可酮和羟考酮复方产品不同,甚至低于曲马多的滥用率。由于美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)现在要求对新药实施主动风险管理计划,曲马多风险管理计划可能作为一个原型模型有用,可以进行修改以适应其他有滥用潜力的药物。