Rolfe Gary
School of Health Science, University of Wales, Swansea, UK.
Nurs Inq. 2005 Jun;12(2):78-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2005.00257.x.
This paper explores Jacques Derrida's strategy of deconstruction as a way of understanding and critiquing nursing theory and practice. Deconstruction has its origins in philosophy, but I argue that it is useful and relevant as a way of challenging the dominant paradigm of any discipline, including nursing. Because deconstruction is notoriously difficult to define, I offer a number of examples of deconstruction in action. In particular, I focus on three critiques of reflective practice by the meta-narrative of evidence-based practice (EBP) and attempt to show how those critiques can be directed back at EBP itself. I conclude with the observation that EBP is open to many of the criticisms that it directs at other discourses, including problems of a lack of empirical evidence, of distortions due to memory, and of falsification of the 'facts'.
本文探讨雅克·德里达的解构策略,将其作为理解和批判护理理论与实践的一种方式。解构起源于哲学,但我认为它作为一种挑战包括护理在内的任何学科的主导范式的方式是有用且相关的。由于解构 notoriously难以定义,我提供了一些解构实际应用的例子。特别是,我聚焦于循证实践(EBP)的元叙事对反思性实践的三种批判,并试图展示这些批判如何能反过来针对EBP本身。我最后观察到,EBP容易受到它针对其他话语提出的许多批评,包括缺乏实证证据、因记忆导致的扭曲以及“事实”的伪造等问题。 (注:notoriously 常见释义为“臭名昭著地”,这里根据语境可理解为“极其、非常”等意思 )