• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对儿童癌症幸存者的邮寄调查问卷的回复率:有条件激励与无条件激励的比较。

Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: a comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives.

作者信息

Rosoff Philip M, Werner Cary, Clipp Elizabeth C, Guill Ann Bebe, Bonner Melanie, Demark-Wahnefried Wendy

机构信息

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, 222 Bell Building, Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 May;14(5):1330-2. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0716.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0716
PMID:15894697
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Mailed surveys are widely used to collect epidemiologic and health service data. Given that nonresponse can threaten the validity of surveys, modest incentives are often used to increase response rates. A study was undertaken among childhood cancer survivors and their parents to determine if response rate to a mailed survey differed with provision of immediate versus delayed incentives.

DESIGN

A self-administered survey designed to ascertain health behaviors was mailed to 397 childhood cancer survivors (and their parents if the survivor was <18 years of age). Subjects were randomized into two groups based on gender, age, race, and cancer type. One group received a 10 US dollars incentive with their blank survey (unconditional incentive), whereas the other group received the incentive upon receipt of their completed survey (conditional incentive). If children were minors, both the parent and the child received incentives.

RESULTS

No significant differences in response rates were observed with respect to gender, age, race, or cancer type. However, significant differences in response rates were observed between incentive groups, with unconditional incentives yielding significantly higher response rates than conditional incentives for child survivors who were > or =18 years (64.4% versus 49.0%), as well as younger child survivors (62.5% versus 43.6%) and their parents (64.8% versus 41.5%; all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The provision of an immediate incentive generated significantly higher response rates to this mailed health survey among childhood cancer survivors and their parents. Given that survey studies are commonly conducted across various pediatric populations, these findings may help inform the design of future pediatric survey research.

摘要

目的

邮寄调查问卷被广泛用于收集流行病学和卫生服务数据。鉴于无应答可能威胁调查的有效性,通常会采用适度的激励措施来提高应答率。对儿童癌症幸存者及其父母进行了一项研究,以确定邮寄调查问卷的应答率在提供即时激励与延迟激励时是否存在差异。

设计

一项旨在确定健康行为的自填式调查问卷被邮寄给397名儿童癌症幸存者(如果幸存者年龄小于18岁,则同时邮寄给其父母)。根据性别、年龄、种族和癌症类型将受试者随机分为两组。一组在收到空白调查问卷时获得10美元的激励(无条件激励),而另一组在收到完成的调查问卷后获得激励(有条件激励)。如果儿童是未成年人,其父母和儿童都会获得激励。

结果

在性别、年龄、种族或癌症类型方面,未观察到应答率有显著差异。然而,在激励组之间观察到了应答率的显著差异,对于18岁及以上的儿童幸存者(64.4%对49.0%)、年龄较小的儿童幸存者(62.5%对43.6%)及其父母(64.8%对41.5%;所有P<0.05),无条件激励产生的应答率显著高于有条件激励。

结论

提供即时激励使儿童癌症幸存者及其父母对这份邮寄的健康调查问卷的应答率显著提高。鉴于调查研究通常在各种儿科人群中进行,这些发现可能有助于为未来儿科调查研究的设计提供参考。

相似文献

1
Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: a comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives.针对儿童癌症幸存者的邮寄调查问卷的回复率:有条件激励与无条件激励的比较。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 May;14(5):1330-2. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0716.
2
No difference in response rate to a mailed survey among prostate cancer survivors using conditional versus unconditional incentives.在前列腺癌幸存者中,使用有条件激励与无条件激励进行邮寄调查时,回应率没有差异。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 Feb;13(2):277-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-03-0065.
3
Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates.回复率与代表性:抽奖激励提高了医生调查问卷的回复率。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Aug;14(8):571-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.1126.
4
A randomized trial of incentives to improve response rates to a mailed women's health questionnaire.一项关于激励措施以提高邮寄女性健康调查问卷回复率的随机试验。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003 Oct;12(8):821-8. doi: 10.1089/154099903322447783.
5
Physician response rates to a mail survey by specialty and timing of incentive.按专业和激励时机划分的医生对邮件调查的回复率。
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Apr;26(3):234-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.12.013.
6
Randomized trial of $20 versus $50 incentives to increase physician survey response rates.关于20美元与50美元激励措施以提高医生调查问卷回复率的随机试验。
Med Care. 2008 Aug;46(8):878-81. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318178eb1d.
7
Optimal design features for surveying low-income populations.针对低收入人群调查的优化设计特点。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005 Nov;16(4):677-90. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2005.0096.
8
A monetary incentive increases postal survey response rates for pharmacists.金钱激励可提高药剂师对邮政调查的回复率。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Dec;59(12):1099-101. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.037143.
9
Effects of a gift certificate incentive and specialized delivery on prostate cancer survivors' response rate to a mailed survey: a randomized-controlled trial.礼品券激励和专业投递对邮寄调查中前列腺癌幸存者反应率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2014 Apr;5(2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
10
Predictors of healthy behaviour in long-term survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症长期幸存者健康行为的预测因素。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Nov;16(11C):285-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01966.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.增加邮寄和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5.
2
A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys.系统评价增强患者体验调查应答率和代表性的策略。
Med Care. 2022 Dec 1;60(12):910-918. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001784. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
3
A comparison of survey incentive methods to recruit rural cancer survivors into cancer care delivery research studies.
比较调查激励方法以招募农村癌症幸存者参与癌症护理提供研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Nov;33(11):1381-1386. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01621-7. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
4
Experiences, mental well-being and community-based care needs of fathers of late preterm infants: A mixed-methods pilot study.晚期早产儿父亲的经验、心理健康和社区护理需求:一项混合方法的初步研究。
Nurs Open. 2019 Nov 6;7(1):127-136. doi: 10.1002/nop2.370. eCollection 2020 Jan.
5
Communicating health information and improving coordination with primary care (CHIIP): Rationale and design of a randomized cardiovascular health promotion trial for adult survivors of childhood cancer.沟通健康信息和改善与初级保健的协调(CHIIP):一项针对儿童癌症成年幸存者的心血管健康促进随机试验的原理和设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Feb;89:105915. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105915. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
6
Population-Based Survey Methods for Reaching Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Pediatric Cancer and Their Parents.基于人群的调查方法,以接触儿科癌症的青少年和年轻成年幸存者及其父母。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2019 Feb;8(1):40-48. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0033. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
7
Breastfeeding the late preterm infant: experiences of mothers and perceptions of public health nurses.晚期早产儿的母乳喂养:母亲的经历及公共卫生护士的看法
Int Breastfeed J. 2017 May 8;12:23. doi: 10.1186/s13006-017-0114-0. eCollection 2016.
8
Psychosocial Outcomes of Sharing a Diagnosis of Cancer with a Pediatric Patient.与儿科患者分享癌症诊断的心理社会结果。
Front Pediatr. 2016 Jul 20;4:70. doi: 10.3389/fped.2016.00070. eCollection 2016.
9
National survey of physicians to determine the effect of unconditional incentives on response rates of physician postal surveys.针对医生的全国性调查,以确定无条件激励措施对医生邮寄调查问卷回复率的影响。
BMJ Open. 2015 Feb 18;5(2):e007166. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007166.
10
The use of incentives in vulnerable populations for a telephone survey: a randomized controlled trial.在弱势群体中采用激励措施进行电话调查:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Oct 19;5:572. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-572.