Belt P J, Dickinson I C, Theile D R B
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Wolloongabba, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.
Br J Plast Surg. 2005 Jun;58(4):425-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.11.002.
This paper compares allograft alone and in combination with vascularised free fibular flaps (FFF) to reconstruct long bone defects after tumour excision. We present 33 cases, 21 of these patients had reconstruction with an allograft alone as the initial procedure. Nine patients underwent reconstruction with FFF plus allograft plus iliac crest bone graft (ICG), two patients underwent reconstruction with a FFF and ICG and one patient underwent reconstruction with an allograft, a pedicled fibular flap and a FFF. The allograft was obtained from the Queensland Bone Bank and had been irradiated to 25 000Gy. In our experience (N=21) the complication rates with allograft alone were: delayed union 3, nonunion 7, fractured allograft 6, infection requiring resection of the allograft 3, other infections 2. The revision rate was 48% (10 cases of which five required a free fibular flap) and an average of 1.8 revision procedures were required. In the lower limb cases, the mean time to full weightbearing was 20 months and 40% were full weightbearing at 18 months. We felt that the high complication rate compared with other series may have been related to the irradiation of the graft. FFFs were used in 18 cases, 12 cases were primary reconstructions and six were revision reconstructions. The mean fibular length was 19.4 cm (range 10-29 cm). There were no flap losses and the FFF united at both ends of 11 of 12 primary reconstruction cases. One case had nonunion at one end, giving a union rate of 96% (23 of 24 junctions). When a FFF was used in combination with an allograft as a primary reconstruction, the allograft nonunion rate was 50% (five of 10 cases). The mean time to full weightbearing in the lower limb cases was 7.5 months and 100% were full weightbearing at 18 months. The FFF hastens time to full weightbearing but does not appear to affect the complication rates of allograft. The number of revision procedures required is reduced in the presence of a FFF and is the latter is a useful technique for the salvage of refractory cases.
本文比较了单纯同种异体骨以及联合带血管游离腓骨瓣(FFF)用于重建肿瘤切除术后长骨缺损的情况。我们共纳入33例患者,其中21例患者最初采用单纯同种异体骨进行重建。9例患者采用FFF联合同种异体骨及髂嵴骨移植(ICG)进行重建,2例患者采用FFF和ICG进行重建,1例患者采用同种异体骨、带蒂腓骨瓣和FFF进行重建。同种异体骨取自昆士兰骨库,已接受25000Gy的辐照。根据我们的经验(n = 21),单纯同种异体骨的并发症发生率为:骨延迟愈合3例,骨不连7例,同种异体骨骨折6例,因感染需切除同种异体骨3例,其他感染2例。翻修率为48%(10例,其中5例需要游离腓骨瓣),平均需要1.8次翻修手术。在下肢病例中,完全负重的平均时间为20个月,40%的患者在18个月时完全负重。我们认为,与其他系列相比,较高的并发症发生率可能与移植骨的辐照有关。18例患者使用了FFF,其中12例为初次重建,6例为翻修重建。腓骨平均长度为19.4 cm(范围10 - 29 cm)。没有皮瓣丢失,12例初次重建病例中有11例的FFF在两端愈合。1例一端骨不连,愈合率为96%(24个结合处中的23个)。当FFF与同种异体骨联合用于初次重建时,同种异体骨不连率为50%(10例中的5例)。下肢病例完全负重的平均时间为7.5个月,100%的患者在18个月时完全负重。FFF加快了完全负重的时间,但似乎不影响同种异体骨的并发症发生率。在有FFF的情况下,所需翻修手术的数量减少,FFF是挽救难治性病例的一种有用技术。