Hemström Orjan
Centre for Health Equity Studies, Stockholm University/Karolinska Institute, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Aug;61(3):637-47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.028. Epub 2005 Feb 19.
The main aim of this study was to explore the mediating role made by work environment to health inequalities by wage income in Sweden. Gender differences were also analysed. Data from the Swedish Survey of Living Conditions for the years 1998 and 1999 were analysed. Employed 20-64-year olds with a registered wage were included (nearly 6000 respondents). Sex-specific logistic regressions in relation to global self-rated health were applied. Those in the lowest income quintile had 2.4 times (men) and 4.3 times (women) higher probability of less than good health than did those in the highest quintile (adjusted for age, family status, country of birth, education level, smoking and full-time work). The mediating contribution of work environment factors to the health gradient by income was 25 per cent (men) and 29 per cent (women), respectively. This contribution was observed mainly from ergonomic and physical exposure, decision authority and skill discretion. Psychological demands did not contribute to such inequalities because mentally demanding work tasks are more common in high income as compared with low income jobs. Using sex-specific income quintiles, instead of income quintiles for the entire sample, gave very similar results. In conclusion, work environment factors can be seen as important mediators for the association between wage income and ill health in Sweden. A larger residual effect of income on health for women as compared with men suggests that one's own income from work is a more important determinant of women's than men's ill health in Sweden.
本研究的主要目的是探讨瑞典工作环境通过工资收入对健康不平等产生的中介作用。同时也分析了性别差异。对1998年和1999年瑞典生活条件调查的数据进行了分析。纳入了有登记工资的20 - 64岁就业人员(近6000名受访者)。应用了与总体自我健康评价相关的性别特异性逻辑回归分析。收入最低五分位数组的人群健康状况不佳的概率比收入最高五分位数组的人群高出2.4倍(男性)和4.3倍(女性)(对年龄、家庭状况、出生国家、教育水平、吸烟情况和全职工作进行了调整)。工作环境因素对收入导致的健康梯度的中介作用分别为25%(男性)和29%(女性)。这种作用主要体现在人体工程学和身体暴露、决策权力和技能自主性方面。心理需求并未导致此类不平等,因为与低收入工作相比,高收入工作中需要脑力的工作任务更为常见。使用按性别划分的收入五分位数组而非整个样本的收入五分位数组,得到了非常相似的结果。总之,在瑞典,工作环境因素可被视为工资收入与健康不佳之间关联的重要中介因素。与男性相比,收入对女性健康的剩余影响更大,这表明在瑞典,个人工作收入对女性健康不佳的决定作用比对男性更大。