Suppr超能文献

社会经济地位与健康行为和死亡率的关联。

Association of socioeconomic position with health behaviors and mortality.

机构信息

INSERM U1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Bât 15/16, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94807 Villejuif Cedex, France.

出版信息

JAMA. 2010 Mar 24;303(12):1159-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.297.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Previous studies may have underestimated the contribution of health behaviors to social inequalities in mortality because health behaviors were assessed only at the baseline of the study.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the role of health behaviors in the association between socioeconomic position and mortality and compare whether their contribution differs when assessed at only 1 point in time with that assessed longitudinally through the follow-up period.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Established in 1985, the British Whitehall II longitudinal cohort study includes 10 308 civil servants, aged 35 to 55 years, living in London, England. Analyses are based on 9590 men and women followed up for mortality until April 30, 2009. Socioeconomic position was derived from civil service employment grade (high, intermediate, and low) at baseline. Smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and physical activity were assessed 4 times during the follow-up period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All-cause and cause-specific mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 654 participants died during the follow-up period. In the analyses adjusted for sex and year of birth, those with the lowest socioeconomic position had 1.60 times higher risk of death from all causes than those with the highest socioeconomic position (a rate difference of 1.94/1000 person-years). This association was attenuated by 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21%-94%) when health behaviors assessed at baseline were entered into the model and by 72% (95% CI, 42%-154%) when they were entered as time-dependent covariates. The corresponding attenuations were 29% (95% CI, 11%-54%) and 45% (95% CI, 24%-79%) for cardiovascular mortality and 61% (95% CI, 16%-425%) and 94% (95% CI, 35%-595%) for noncancer and noncardiovascular mortality. The difference between the baseline only and repeated assessments of health behaviors was mostly due to an increased explanatory power of diet (from 7% to 17% for all-cause mortality, respectively), physical activity (from 5% to 21% for all-cause mortality), and alcohol consumption (from 3% to 12% for all-cause mortality). The role of smoking, the strongest mediator in these analyses, did not change when using baseline or repeat assessments (from 32% to 35% for all-cause mortality).

CONCLUSION

In a civil service population in London, England, there was an association between socioeconomic position and mortality that was substantially accounted for by adjustment for health behaviors, particularly when the behaviors were assessed repeatedly.

摘要

背景

先前的研究可能低估了健康行为对死亡率的社会不平等的贡献,因为健康行为仅在研究的基线进行评估。

目的

研究健康行为在社会经济地位与死亡率之间的关联中的作用,并比较仅在一个时间点进行评估与通过随访期进行纵向评估时,其贡献是否有所不同。

设计、地点和参与者:1985 年成立的英国白厅 II 纵向队列研究包括居住在英格兰伦敦的 10308 名公务员,年龄在 35 至 55 岁之间。基于截至 2009 年 4 月 30 日的死亡率随访,对 9590 名男性和女性进行了分析。社会经济地位由基线时的公务员职位(高、中、低)决定。在随访期间进行了 4 次吸烟、饮酒、饮食和身体活动评估。

主要结果测量

全因和死因特异性死亡率。

结果

在随访期间共有 654 名参与者死亡。在调整性别和出生年份后,社会经济地位最低的人死于各种原因的风险比社会经济地位最高的人高 1.60 倍(率差为 1.94/1000人年)。当将基线评估的健康行为纳入模型时,这种关联减弱了 42%(95%置信区间[CI],21%-94%),当将其作为时间相关协变量纳入时,关联减弱了 72%(95%CI,42%-154%)。心血管死亡率的相应衰减幅度分别为 29%(95%CI,11%-54%)和 45%(95%CI,24%-79%),非癌症和非心血管死亡率分别为 61%(95%CI,16%-425%)和 94%(95%CI,35%-595%)。仅基线评估和重复评估健康行为之间的差异主要归因于饮食(全因死亡率分别从 7%增加到 17%)、身体活动(全因死亡率分别从 5%增加到 21%)和饮酒(全因死亡率分别从 3%增加到 12%)的解释力增加。在这些分析中,最强的中介因素吸烟的作用在使用基线或重复评估时并未改变(全因死亡率分别为 32%至 35%)。

结论

在英格兰伦敦的公务员人群中,社会经济地位与死亡率之间存在关联,通过调整健康行为,尤其是重复评估健康行为,可以大大解释这种关联。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验