Suppr超能文献

健康人群中,每个周期的慢波活动与每晚超日睡眠周期数量之间呈负相关。

Inverse association between Slow Wave Activity per cycle and the number of ultradian sleep cycles per night in healthy humans.

作者信息

Le Bon Olivier, Chabanski Sophie, Dramaix Michele, Staner Luc, Pelc Isidore, Linkowski Paul

机构信息

Sleep Research Unit, Brugmann University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CHU Brugmann S78, Place Van Gehuchten 4, 1020 Bruxelles, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Jul;116(7):1493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.03.005.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Comparisons of sleep Slow Wave Activity (SWA) during successive sleep cycles rely on the assumption that SWA in a given cycle is independent of the number of ultradian cycles present in a night. This assumption was evaluated here.

METHODS

Twenty-six healthy controls with no medical, sleep or psychiatric disorders were selected among 84 candidates and their sleep was recorded at home across 2 consecutive nights after two habituation nights.

RESULTS

In comparison with nights with less cycles, nights with more cycles showed significantly more REMS but not more NREMS. No correlation was found between the number of cycles and the integrated SWA per night (epochs visually scored as NREMS). However, inverse correlations were found between the number of cycles and the SWA per cycle. This was significant on both nights in Cycle 1 and strong trends were found for the two subsequent cycles on Night 2. Comparable results were found after removal of nights containing suspected Skipped First REMS episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The SWA in a cycle was found to be inversely correlated to the number of cycles in the first 3 cycles in at least one of the two analyzed nights.

SIGNIFICANCE

Differences in the number of cycles per night are a potential bias in the comparisons of SWA per cycles.

摘要

目的

连续睡眠周期中睡眠慢波活动(SWA)的比较依赖于这样一个假设,即给定周期中的SWA与夜间存在的超日周期数量无关。在此对这一假设进行评估。

方法

从84名候选人中挑选出26名无医学、睡眠或精神疾病的健康对照者,在经过两个适应夜后,连续两个晚上在家中记录他们的睡眠情况。

结果

与周期较少的夜晚相比,周期较多的夜晚快速眼动睡眠(REMS)显著更多,但非快速眼动睡眠(NREMS)并非更多。未发现周期数量与每晚的综合SWA(视觉评分被判定为NREMS的时段)之间存在相关性。然而,发现周期数量与每个周期的SWA之间存在负相关。在第1周期的两个晚上这一相关性均显著,在第2晚随后的两个周期中发现了强烈趋势。在去除包含疑似首次快速眼动睡眠缺失发作的夜晚后,得到了类似结果。

结论

在至少一个分析夜晚的前3个周期中,发现一个周期内的SWA与周期数量呈负相关。

意义

每晚周期数量的差异是每个周期SWA比较中的一个潜在偏差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验