Lutz Werner K, Tiedge Oliver, Lutz Roman W, Stopper Helga
Department of Toxicology, University of Würzburg, 97078 Würzburg, Germany.
Toxicol Sci. 2005 Aug;86(2):318-23. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfi200. Epub 2005 May 18.
Distinction between dose addition and response addition for the analysis of the toxicity of mixtures may allow differentiation of the components regarding similar versus independent mode of action. For nonlinear dose responses for the components, curves of dose addition and response addition differ and embrace an "envelope of additivity." Synergistic or antagonistic interaction may then be postulated only if the mixture effect is outside this surface. This situation was analyzed for the induction of micronuclei in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells by the two methylating agents methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) and the topoisomerase-II inhibitor genistein (GEN). All three chemicals reproducibly generated sublinear (upward convex) dose-response relationships. For the analysis of mixture effects, these genotoxic agents were investigated in the three binary combinations. Statistical testing for dose addition along parallel exponential dose responses was performed by linear regression with interaction based on the logarithm of the number of cells that contain micronuclei. For MMS+MNU, the mixture effect was compatible with dose addition (i.e., significantly larger than calculated for the addition of net responses). For MMS+GEN, the measured effect was larger than for response addition but smaller than for dose addition. For MNU+GEN, the measured effect was below response addition, indicative of true antagonism. In the absence of knowledge on the sublinear dose-response relationships for the individual components, a synergistic effect of MMS on both MNU and GEN would have been postulated erroneously. The observed difference between MMS and MNU when combined with GEN would not have been predicted on the basis of a simplistic interpretation of DNA methylation as the mode of action and may be due to differences in the profile of DNA methylations and/or epigenetic effects. We conclude that knowledge of nonlinearities of the dose-response curves of individual components of a mixture can be crucial to analyze for synergism or antagonism and that an in-depth mechanistic knowledge is useful for a prediction of similarity or independence of action.
在分析混合物毒性时,区分剂量相加和反应相加可有助于区分具有相似作用模式与独立作用模式的组分。对于各组分的非线性剂量反应,剂量相加曲线和反应相加曲线有所不同,并包含一个“相加性包络”。只有当混合物效应超出该表面时,才可能假定存在协同或拮抗相互作用。本文分析了两种甲基化剂甲磺酸甲酯(MMS)和N-甲基-N-亚硝基脲(MNU)以及拓扑异构酶-II抑制剂染料木黄酮(GEN)在L5178Y小鼠淋巴瘤细胞中诱导微核的情况。所有这三种化学物质均可重复性地产生亚线性(向上凸)剂量反应关系。为了分析混合物效应,对这三种遗传毒性剂进行了三种二元组合研究。通过基于含有微核的细胞数的对数进行带有相互作用的线性回归,对沿平行指数剂量反应的剂量相加进行统计检验。对于MMS + MNU,混合物效应与剂量相加相符(即明显大于净反应相加计算值)。对于MMS + GEN,实测效应大于反应相加但小于剂量相加。对于MNU + GEN,实测效应低于反应相加,表明存在真正的拮抗作用。在不了解各组分的亚线性剂量反应关系的情况下,会错误地假定MMS对MNU和GEN均有协同作用。基于将DNA甲基化简单解释为作用模式,无法预测MMS与GEN组合时与MNU组合时所观察到的差异,这可能是由于DNA甲基化谱和/或表观遗传效应的差异所致。我们得出结论,了解混合物各组分剂量反应曲线的非线性对于分析协同或拮抗作用可能至关重要,深入的作用机制知识有助于预测作用的相似性或独立性。