• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次全膝关节置换术后因僵硬而翻修固定良好的假体组件后的功能结果。

Functional results after revision of well-fixed components for stiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Haidukewych George J, Jacofsky David J, Pagnano Mark W, Trousdale Robert T

机构信息

Division of Adult Reconstruction, Florida Orthopedic Institute, Temple Terrace, Florida 33637, USA.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2005 Feb;20(2):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.057.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.057
PMID:15902850
Abstract

Between 1990 and 2001, 16 well-fixed, aseptic, primary total knee arthroplasties were revised in 15 patients for a diagnosis of stiffness. Patients were followed for a mean of 42 months (range, 2-6 years). Of 15 patients, 10 (66%) were satisfied with the results of the procedure. The mean Knee Society pain score improved from 28 to 65 points, and the mean functional score improved from 45 to 58 points. The mean arc of motion improved from 40 degrees preoperatively to 73 degrees postoperatively. Recurrent stiffness required additional intervention in 4 knees (3 patients, 25%). The results of revision of a well-fixed, stiff, primary total knee arthroplasty were mixed in our hands and provided only modest improvements in pain, function, and arc of motion. Key words: knee, arthroplasty, stiffness, revision, arthrofibrosis.

摘要

1990年至2001年间,15例患者的16例固定良好、无菌的初次全膝关节置换术因僵硬诊断而进行翻修。对患者平均随访42个月(范围为2至6年)。15例患者中,10例(66%)对手术结果满意。膝关节协会疼痛评分平均从28分提高到65分,功能评分平均从45分提高到58分。平均活动弧度从术前的40度提高到术后的73度。4例膝关节(3例患者,25%)出现复发性僵硬需要额外干预。在我们手中,固定良好、僵硬的初次全膝关节置换术翻修的结果参差不齐,仅在疼痛、功能和活动弧度方面有适度改善。关键词:膝关节、关节成形术、僵硬、翻修、关节纤维性变

相似文献

1
Functional results after revision of well-fixed components for stiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty.初次全膝关节置换术后因僵硬而翻修固定良好的假体组件后的功能结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2005 Feb;20(2):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.057.
2
Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision.全膝关节置换术后僵硬。并发症的发生率及翻修结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jul;86(7):1479-84.
3
Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后的僵硬
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87 Suppl 1(Pt 2):264-70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E-00345.
4
Protocol-Driven Revision for Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty Improves Motion and Clinical Outcomes.关节置换术后僵硬的基于方案的修正可改善运动和临床结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Sep;33(9):2952-2955. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 30.
5
Revision Arthroplasty for the Management of Stiffness After Primary TKA.初次全膝关节置换术后僵硬处理的翻修关节成形术
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1935-1939. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
6
Improved clinical outcomes after revision arthroplasty with a hinged implant for severely stiff total knee arthroplasty.铰链型假体翻修治疗严重僵硬性全膝关节置换术的临床转归改善。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1043-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5235-5. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
7
Poor outcomes of isolated tibial insert exchange and arthrolysis for the management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty.单纯胫骨假体置换及关节松解术治疗全膝关节置换术后僵硬效果不佳。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Oct;83(10):1534-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200110000-00012.
8
[Impact of Preoperative Knee Stiffness on the Postoperative Outcome after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Haemophilia].[血友病患者全膝关节置换术前膝关节僵硬对术后结果的影响]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2015 Oct;153(5):526-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1557768. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
9
Revision total knee arthroplasty for stiffness.翻修全膝关节僵硬成形术。
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6 Suppl):62-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.013.
10
Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后关节纤维化
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Nov(380):177-83. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200011000-00024.

引用本文的文献

1
Polyethylene exchange versus full component revision for arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort analysis.全膝关节置换术后关节纤维化的聚乙烯交换与全组件翻修:一项回顾性队列分析。
J Orthop. 2023 Oct 5;45:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.002. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Hot spots and trends in knee revision research since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis.21世纪以来膝关节翻修研究的热点与趋势:一项文献计量分析
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(5):388. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-3969.
3
Pathological mechanisms and therapeutic outlooks for arthrofibrosis.
关节纤维化的病理机制与治疗前景
Bone Res. 2019 Mar 26;7:9. doi: 10.1038/s41413-019-0047-x. eCollection 2019.
4
Improved clinical outcomes after revision arthroplasty with a hinged implant for severely stiff total knee arthroplasty.铰链型假体翻修治疗严重僵硬性全膝关节置换术的临床转归改善。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1043-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5235-5. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
5
Metal Hypersensitivity and Total Knee Arthroplasty.金属过敏与全膝关节置换术
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Feb;24(2):106-12. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00290.
6
Moderate clinical improvement after revision arthroplasty of the severely stiff knee.严重僵硬膝关节翻修置换术后临床症状得到中度改善。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3235-3241. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3712-7. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
7
Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome: prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup.修订原因 TKA 预测临床结果:前瞻性评估 150 例连续患者,随访 2 年。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2296-302. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2940-8. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
8
Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff total knee arthroplasty.胫骨组件的内旋在僵硬的全膝关节置换术中很常见。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Aug;469(8):2346-55. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1889-8. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
9
Arthroscopic arthrolysis for the treatment of stiffness after total knee replacement gives moderate improvements in range of motion and functional knee scores.关节镜下松解术治疗全膝关节置换术后僵硬可改善关节活动度和膝关节功能评分。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Mar;18(3):346-51. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0878-x. Epub 2009 Aug 1.
10
Stiffness in total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中的僵硬
J Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Sep;10(3):111-8. doi: 10.1007/s10195-009-0054-6. Epub 2009 Jul 7.