Strohbuecker Barbara, Mayer Herbert, Evers George C M, Sabatowski Rainer
Institute of Nursing Science, University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 May;29(5):498-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.08.012.
Forty-eight units were enrolled in a descriptive, cross-sectional study to identify strengths and weaknesses of pain management in a German university teaching hospital. Patients had to be > or =18 years old and able to speak German; intensive care, psychiatric, obstetric and pediatric units were excluded. Structured interviews were conducted by an independent researcher not involved in patient care. Patients were asked about prevalence of pain during the interview at rest, on movement, and during the 24 hours before the interview; patients rated pain intensity at rest and on movement as well as the worst pain 24 hours before the interview by using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). In addition, patients indicated localization, duration, and causes of pain. Chart analysis was carried out to check for pain medication, ICD-10 diagnoses, and demographic data. To evaluate the adequacy of pain management, the Pain Management Index (PMI) was assessed. A total of 561 of the 825 inpatients who were contacted participated in the study. Fifty percent experienced pain during the interview and 63% reported pain during the preceding 24 hours. Fifty-eight percent had moderate or severe pain (VAS > or = 45 mm) and 36% reported severe pain (VAS > or = 65 mm). Thirty-three percent had pain for more than six months. The most prevalent localization of the strongest pain was in the lower extremities (20%). Fifty percent of patients with pain received pain medication. Patients on the surgical wards (P = 0.002) and those having severe pain (P < 0.001) were more likely to get analgesics. However, 30% of those with VAS> or =65 mm received no analgesic and only 24% had adequate medication. A negative PMI, indicating inadequate pain therapy, was found in 44% (246/559) of the sample. Sex and age did not influence pain prevalence, pain intensity, or pain therapy. Pain prevalence and intensity in this German university hospital were high and pain therapy was inadequate in many cases. Pain management needs to be improved by continuous assessment and adequate pain medication.
48个科室参与了一项描述性横断面研究,以确定德国一家大学教学医院疼痛管理的优势与不足。患者年龄须≥18岁且会说德语;重症监护、精神科、产科和儿科科室被排除在外。由一名不参与患者护理的独立研究人员进行结构化访谈。在访谈中,询问患者静息时、活动时以及访谈前24小时内疼痛的发生率;患者使用10厘米视觉模拟量表(VAS)对静息时、活动时的疼痛强度以及访谈前24小时内最严重的疼痛进行评分。此外,患者指出疼痛的部位、持续时间和原因。进行病历分析以检查疼痛用药、国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)诊断结果和人口统计学数据。为评估疼痛管理的充分性,评估了疼痛管理指数(PMI)。在联系的825名住院患者中,共有561名参与了该研究。50%的患者在访谈期间经历疼痛,63%的患者报告在之前24小时内有疼痛。58%的患者有中度或重度疼痛(VAS≥45毫米),36%的患者报告有重度疼痛(VAS≥65毫米)。33%的患者疼痛持续超过6个月。最强烈疼痛最常见的部位是下肢(20%)。50%的疼痛患者接受了止痛药物治疗。外科病房的患者(P = 0.002)和有重度疼痛的患者(P < 0.001)更有可能获得镇痛药。然而,VAS≥65毫米的患者中有30%未接受任何镇痛药治疗,只有24%的患者用药充足。在44%(246/559)的样本中发现PMI为阴性,表明疼痛治疗不充分。性别和年龄不影响疼痛发生率、疼痛强度或疼痛治疗。这家德国大学医院的疼痛发生率和强度很高,且在很多情况下疼痛治疗不充分。需要通过持续评估和适当的止痛药物来改善疼痛管理。